Literature DB >> 16321484

HRT use in 2001 and 2004 in The Netherlands--a world of difference.

Lolkje T W de Jong-van den Berg1, Adrianne Faber, Paul B van den Berg.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Did the publication of the Women Health Initiative (WHI) trial in 2002 and the Million Women Study (MWS) in 2003 lead to changes in prescription rates of hormone replacement therapy (HRT). Therefore, we compare the prescribing of HRT in 2004 (after) with that of 2001 (before the publications) in The Netherlands.
METHOD: Community pharmacy dispensing data from a population of approximately 500,000 patients in The Netherlands. Women aged 40-74 years to whom at least one HRT prescription was dispensed in 2001 or 2004 were included. Annual prevalences of HRT in 2001 and 2004 and the percentage change (2004 versus 2001) were calculated for overall HRT (excluding vaginal products) and per HRT category (combined estrogens and progestagens, estrogens only, tibolon and vaginal preparations) and age category.
RESULTS: In 2001, 5.64% of the women aged 40-74 used HRT and this percentage declined to 2.39 in 2004. The use of vaginal products among these women did not change, 1.76% in 2001 and 1.65% in 2004. The percentage change was highest in the opposed HRT group (66% decrease) and in women aged 50-54 (64.4% decrease). In 2004, compared with 2001, the proportion of long-term users (>3 year) increased with 12.7%.
CONCLUSIONS: In The Netherlands, after publication of the WHI study and the MWS the prescribing of HRT fell dramatically whereas the prescribing of vaginal products did not change. Future patterns of HRT use should be monitored to know whether this decrease will be sustained.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16321484     DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2005.10.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Maturitas        ISSN: 0378-5122            Impact factor:   4.342


  6 in total

1.  Hip fracture in postmenopausal women after cessation of hormone therapy: results from a prospective study in a large health management organization.

Authors:  Roksana Karim; Richard M Dell; Denise F Greene; Wendy J Mack; J Christopher Gallagher; Howard N Hodis
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 2.  Impact of mammographic screening on the detection of good and poor prognosis breast cancers.

Authors:  Laura J Esserman; Yiwey Shieh; Emiel J T Rutgers; Michael Knauer; Valesca P Retèl; Stella Mook; Annuska M Glas; Dan H Moore; Sabine Linn; Flora E van Leeuwen; Laura J van 't Veer
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2011-09-04       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  The proportion of postmenopausal breast cancer cases in the Netherlands attributable to lifestyle-related risk factors.

Authors:  W A van Gemert; C I Lanting; R A Goldbohm; P A van den Brandt; H G Grooters; E Kampman; L A L M Kiemeney; F E van Leeuwen; E M Monninkhof; E de Vries; P H Peeters; S G Elias
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Women's perceptions of personalized risk-based breast cancer screening and prevention: An international focus group study.

Authors:  Linda Rainey; Anna Jervaeus; Louise S Donnelly; D Gareth Evans; Mattias Hammarström; Per Hall; Yvonne Wengström; Mireille J M Broeders; Daniëlle van der Waal
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2019-03-25       Impact factor: 3.894

5.  Remarkable change in age-specific breast cancer incidence in the Swiss canton of Geneva and its possible relation with the use of hormone replacement therapy.

Authors:  Christine Bouchardy; Alfredo Morabia; Helena M Verkooijen; Gérald Fioretta; Yves Wespi; Peter Schäfer
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2006-03-22       Impact factor: 4.430

6.  Differences in menopausal hormone therapy use among women in Germany between 1998 and 2003.

Authors:  Yong Du; Martina Dören; Hans-Ulrich W Melchert; Christa Scheidt-Nave; Hildtraud Knopf
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2007-10-18       Impact factor: 2.809

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.