Literature DB >> 16320277

Dynamic balancing randomization in controlled clinical trials.

Stephane Heritier1, Val Gebski, Avinesh Pillai.   

Abstract

In the design of randomized clinical trials, balancing of treatment allocation across important prognostic factors (strata) improves the efficiency of the final comparisons. Whilst randomization methods exist which attempt to balance treatments across the strata (permuted blocks, minimization, biased coin), these approaches assign equal importance for all the strata. Dynamic balancing randomization (DBR) is a tree-based method proposed by Signorini et al. allowing different levels of imbalance in different strata which ensures a balance for each level of prognostic risk factors (conditional balance) whilst at the same time preserving randomness. We present a simple modification to the original approach to maintain a marginal balance over important strata and examine the properties of this modification. Two important measures of performance are used to provide comparisons between the approaches: a loss function, which can be interpreted as the squared norm of the imbalance vector, and a forcing index which conveys the degree of randomness. A comparison of DBR with minimization and a biased coin design is carried out by simulation on two simulated trials. Copyright 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16320277     DOI: 10.1002/sim.2421

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  8 in total

1.  Covariate Balancing through Naturally Occurring Strata.

Authors:  Farrokh Alemi; Amr ElRafey; Ivan Avramovic
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Implementing Optimal Designs for Dose-Response Studies Through Adaptive Randomization for a Small Population Group.

Authors:  Yevgen Ryeznik; Oleksandr Sverdlov; Andrew C Hooker
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 4.009

3.  A Bayesian response-adaptive covariate-balanced randomization design with application to a leukemia clinical trial.

Authors:  Ying Yuan; Xuelin Huang; Suyu Liu
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Dynamic randomization and a randomization model for clinical trials data.

Authors:  Lee D Kaiser
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Statistical issues in the use of dynamic allocation methods for balancing baseline covariates.

Authors:  G R Pond
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2011-05-03       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 6.  Allocation techniques for balance at baseline in cluster randomized trials: a methodological review.

Authors:  Noah M Ivers; Ilana J Halperin; Jan Barnsley; Jeremy M Grimshaw; Baiju R Shah; Karen Tu; Ross Upshur; Merrick Zwarenstein
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 2.279

7.  Does the use of an electronic reminder device with or without counseling improve adherence to lipid-lowering treatment? The results of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  M J Kooy; B L G van Wijk; E R Heerdink; A de Boer; M L Bouvy
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 5.810

8.  Effect of 6 months hybrid closed-loop insulin delivery in young people with type 1 diabetes: a randomised controlled trial protocol.

Authors:  Martin de Bock; Sybil A McAuley; Mary Binsu Abraham; Grant Smith; Jennifer Nicholas; Geoff R Ambler; Fergus J Cameron; Jan M Fairchild; Bruce R King; Elizabeth A Geelhoed; Elizabeth A Davis; David Norman O'Neal; Timothy W Jones
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 2.692

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.