Literature DB >> 16320260

Additive and multiplicative covariate regression models for relative survival incorporating fractional polynomials for time-dependent effects.

Paul C Lambert1, Lucy K Smith, David R Jones, Johannes L Botha.   

Abstract

Relative survival is used to estimate patient survival excluding causes of death not related to the disease of interest. Rather than using cause of death information from death certificates, which is often poorly recorded, relative survival compares the observed survival to that expected in a matched group from the general population. Models for relative survival can be expressed on the hazard (mortality) rate scale as the sum of two components where the total mortality rate is the sum of the underlying baseline mortality rate and the excess mortality rate due to the disease of interest. Previous models for relative survival have assumed that covariate effects act multiplicatively and have thus provided relative effects of differences between groups using excess mortality rate ratios. In this paper we consider (i) the use of an additive covariate model, which provides estimates of the absolute difference in the excess mortality rate; and (ii) the use of fractional polynomials in relative survival models for the baseline excess mortality rate and time-dependent effects. The approaches are illustrated using data on 115 331 female breast cancer patients diagnosed between 1 January 1986 and 31 December 1990. The use of additive covariate relative survival models can be useful in situations when the excess mortality rate is zero or slightly less than zero and can provide useful information from a public health perspective. The use of fractional polynomials has advantages over the usual piecewise estimation by providing smooth estimates of the baseline excess mortality rate and time-dependent effects for both the multiplicative and additive covariate models. All models presented in this paper can be estimated within a generalized linear models framework and thus can be implemented using standard software. Copyright 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16320260     DOI: 10.1002/sim.2399

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  13 in total

1.  On comparison of net survival curves.

Authors:  Klemen Pavlič; Maja Pohar Perme
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 4.615

2.  A class of transformation covariate regression models for estimating the excess hazard in relative survival analysis.

Authors:  Binbing Yu
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Flexible modeling improves assessment of prognostic value of C-reactive protein in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  B Gagnon; M Abrahamowicz; Y Xiao; M-E Beauchamp; N MacDonald; G Kasymjanova; H Kreisman; D Small
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 7.640

4.  Dynamic regression hazards models for relative survival.

Authors:  Giuliana Cortese; Thomas H Scheike
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Performance of two formal tests based on martingales residuals to check the proportional hazard assumption and the functional form of the prognostic factors in flexible parametric excess hazard models.

Authors:  Coraline Danieli; Nadine Bossard; Laurent Roche; Aurelien Belot; Zoe Uhry; Hadrien Charvat; Laurent Remontet
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 5.899

6.  Assessing methods for dealing with treatment switching in randomised controlled trials: a simulation study.

Authors:  James P Morden; Paul C Lambert; Nicholas Latimer; Keith R Abrams; Allan J Wailoo
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 4.615

7.  Competing risk models to estimate the excess mortality and the first recurrent-event hazards.

Authors:  Aurélien Belot; Laurent Remontet; Guy Launoy; Valérie Jooste; Roch Giorgi
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 4.615

8.  Network meta-analysis of survival data with fractional polynomials.

Authors:  Jeroen P Jansen
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 4.615

9.  Individual patient data meta-analysis of survival data using Poisson regression models.

Authors:  Michael J Crowther; Richard D Riley; Jan A Staessen; Jiguang Wang; Francois Gueyffier; Paul C Lambert
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 4.615

10.  Mortality According to CD4 Count at Start of Combination Antiretroviral Therapy Among HIV-infected Patients Followed for up to 15 Years After Start of Treatment: Collaborative Cohort Study.

Authors:  Margaret T May; Jorg-Janne Vehreschild; Adam Trickey; Niels Obel; Peter Reiss; Fabrice Bonnet; Murielle Mary-Krause; Hasina Samji; Matthias Cavassini; Michael John Gill; Leah C Shepherd; Heidi M Crane; Antonella d'Arminio Monforte; Greer A Burkholder; Margaret M Johnson; Paz Sobrino-Vegas; Pere Domingo; Robert Zangerle; Amy C Justice; Timothy R Sterling; José M Miró; Jonathan A C Sterne; Andrew Boulle; Christoph Stephan; Jose M Miro; Matthias Cavassini; Geneviève Chêne; Dominique Costagliola; François Dabis; Antonella D'Arminio Monforte; Julia Del Amo; Ard Van Sighem; Gerd Fätkenheuer; John Gill; Jodie Guest; David Hans-Ulrich Haerry; Robert Hogg; Amy Justice; Leah Shepherd; Neils Obel; Heidi Crane; Colette Smith; Peter Reiss; Michael Saag; Tim Sterling; Ramon Teira; Matthew Williams; Robert Zangerle; Jonathan Sterne; Margaret May; Suzanne Ingle; Adam Trickey
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 9.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.