Literature DB >> 16320147

Electromyographic and kinematic nondisabled gait differences at extremely slow overground and treadmill walking speeds.

Jennifer R Nymark1, Suzanne J Balmer, Ellen H Melis, Edward D Lemaire, Shawn Millar.   

Abstract

This study compared the kinematic and electromyographic (EMG) gait patterns of able-bodied adults at natural speed in contrast to extremely slow overground and treadmill walking speeds. Kinematic and EMG data were collected at three speeds (self-selected, 0.30 m/s, and 0.20 m/s). Eighteen subjects were evaluated for trunk and lower-limb motion and EMG of five lower-limb muscles. Significant reductions were found in segmental motion between natural speed and both slower gait speeds, accompanied by an expected reduction in cadence and stride. EMG patterns at slower speeds showed changes in timing and reduced magnitudes. Phasic timing of the proximal muscles showed the most changes with predominant coactivation, whereas the distal muscles remained consistent with the pattern at natural self-selected speed. Overground versus treadmill gait patterns revealed minimal differences. Consideration of the effects of slower walking speed may help clinicians create interventions to target primary gait deficits on overground or treadmill walking.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16320147     DOI: 10.1682/jrrd.2004.05.0059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev        ISSN: 0748-7711


  23 in total

1.  Motoneuronal and muscle synergies involved in cat hindlimb control during fictive and real locomotion: a comparison study.

Authors:  Sergey N Markin; Michel A Lemay; Boris I Prilutsky; Ilya A Rybak
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Contributions of muscles and passive dynamics to swing initiation over a range of walking speeds.

Authors:  Melanie D Fox; Scott L Delp
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Coordination between upper- and lower-limb movements is different during overground and treadmill walking.

Authors:  Ilaria Carpinella; Paolo Crenna; Marco Rabuffetti; Maurizio Ferrarin
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Dynamic global sagittal alignment evaluated by three-dimensional gait analysis in patients with degenerative lumbar kyphoscoliosis.

Authors:  Yo Shiba; Hiroshi Taneichi; Satoshi Inami; Hiroshi Moridaira; Daisaku Takeuchi; Yutaka Nohara
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Trunk and hip muscle activation patterns are different during walking in young children with and without cerebral palsy.

Authors:  Laura A Prosser; Samuel C K Lee; Ann F VanSant; Mary F Barbe; Richard T Lauer
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2010-04-29

6.  Arm and leg coordination during treadmill walking in individuals with motor incomplete spinal cord injury: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Nicole J Tester; Hugues Barbeau; Dena R Howland; Amy Cantrell; Andrea L Behrman
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 2.840

7.  Post-effect of forward and backward locomotion on body orientation in space during quiet stance.

Authors:  Alessandro Marco De Nunzio; Carlo Zanetti; Marco Schieppati
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 3.078

8.  Muscle contributions to support and progression over a range of walking speeds.

Authors:  May Q Liu; Frank C Anderson; Michael H Schwartz; Scott L Delp
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2008-09-25       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Human-Robot Interaction: Does Robotic Guidance Force Affect Gait-Related Brain Dynamics during Robot-Assisted Treadmill Walking?

Authors:  Kristel Knaepen; Andreas Mierau; Eva Swinnen; Helio Fernandez Tellez; Marc Michielsen; Eric Kerckhofs; Dirk Lefeber; Romain Meeusen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  An evaluation of symmetry in the lower limb joints during the able-bodied gait of women and men.

Authors:  Wanda Forczek; Robert Staszkiewicz
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2012-12-30       Impact factor: 2.193

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.