Literature DB >> 16319886

Scalable multiparticle entanglement of trapped ions.

H Häffner1, W Hänsel, C F Roos, J Benhelm, D Chek-al-Kar, M Chwalla, T Körber, U D Rapol, M Riebe, P O Schmidt, C Becher, O Gühne, W Dür, R Blatt.   

Abstract

The generation, manipulation and fundamental understanding of entanglement lies at the very heart of quantum mechanics. Entangled particles are non-interacting but are described by a common wavefunction; consequently, individual particles are not independent of each other and their quantum properties are inextricably interwoven. The intriguing features of entanglement become particularly evident if the particles can be individually controlled and physically separated. However, both the experimental realization and characterization of entanglement become exceedingly difficult for systems with many particles. The main difficulty is to manipulate and detect the quantum state of individual particles as well as to control the interaction between them. So far, entanglement of four ions or five photons has been demonstrated experimentally. The creation of scalable multiparticle entanglement demands a non-exponential scaling of resources with particle number. Among the various kinds of entangled states, the 'W state' plays an important role as its entanglement is maximally persistent and robust even under particle loss. Such states are central as a resource in quantum information processing and multiparty quantum communication. Here we report the scalable and deterministic generation of four-, five-, six-, seven- and eight-particle entangled states of the W type with trapped ions. We obtain the maximum possible information on these states by performing full characterization via state tomography, using individual control and detection of the ions. A detailed analysis proves that the entanglement is genuine. The availability of such multiparticle entangled states, together with full information in the form of their density matrices, creates a test-bed for theoretical studies of multiparticle entanglement. Independently, 'Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger' entangled states with up to six ions have been created and analysed in Boulder.

Year:  2005        PMID: 16319886     DOI: 10.1038/nature04279

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  17 in total

1.  Entanglement of spin waves among four quantum memories.

Authors:  K S Choi; A Goban; S B Papp; S J van Enk; H J Kimble
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Preparation and measurement of three-qubit entanglement in a superconducting circuit.

Authors:  L Dicarlo; M D Reed; L Sun; B R Johnson; J M Chow; J M Gambetta; L Frunzio; S M Girvin; M H Devoret; R J Schoelkopf
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Anyonic braiding in optical lattices.

Authors:  Chuanwei Zhang; V W Scarola; Sumanta Tewari; S Das Sarma
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-11-13       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Quantum mechanics: Entanglement goes mechanical.

Authors:  Rainer Blatt
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-06-04       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Efficient quantum state tomography.

Authors:  Marcus Cramer; Martin B Plenio; Steven T Flammia; Rolando Somma; David Gross; Stephen D Bartlett; Olivier Landon-Cardinal; David Poulin; Yi-Kai Liu
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  Beating the classical precision limit with spin-1 Dicke states of more than 10,000 atoms.

Authors:  Yi-Quan Zou; Ling-Na Wu; Qi Liu; Xin-Yu Luo; Shuai-Feng Guo; Jia-Hao Cao; Meng Khoon Tey; Li You
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Witnessing entanglement without entanglement witness operators.

Authors:  Luca Pezzè; Yan Li; Weidong Li; Augusto Smerzi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Tunable quantum beam splitters for coherent manipulation of a solid-state tripartite qubit system.

Authors:  Guozhu Sun; Xueda Wen; Bo Mao; Jian Chen; Yang Yu; Peiheng Wu; Siyuan Han
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2010-08-10       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Optimal Sparse Eigenspace and Low-Rank Density Matrix Estimation for Quantum Systems.

Authors:  Tony Cai; Donggyu Kim; Xinyu Song; Yazhen Wang
Journal:  J Stat Plan Inference       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 1.095

10.  Fitting magnetic field gradient with Heisenberg-scaling accuracy.

Authors:  Yong-Liang Zhang; Huan Wang; Li Jing; Liang-Zhu Mu; Heng Fan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.