Literature DB >> 16318865

A new approach to the concept and computation of biological age.

Petr Klemera1, Stanislav Doubal.   

Abstract

The lack of exact definition of the concept of biological age (BA) is a typical feature of works concerning BA. That is why comparison of results of various published methods makes little sense and eventual proof of their optimality is impossible. Based on natural and simple presumptions, an attempt to express mathematically the supposed relation between chronological age (CA) and BA has proven to be unexpectedly fruitful. In the present paper, an optimum method of estimation of BA, which is easily applicable even in nonlinear cases, is derived. Moreover, the method allows evaluating the precision of the estimates and also offers tools for validation of presumptions of the method. A special feature of the method is that CA should be used as a standard biomarker, leading to essential improving the precision of BA-estimate and illuminating relativity of the known "paradox of biomarkers". All theoretical results of the method were fully approved by means of a special simulation program. Further, the theory and the results of the simulation have proven that many published results of BA-estimates using multiple linear regression (MLR) are very probably disserviceable because CA is typically more precise estimate of BA than estimates computed by MLR. This unpleasant conclusion also concerns methods, which use MLR as the final step after transformation of the battery of biomarkers by factor analysis or by principal component analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16318865     DOI: 10.1016/j.mad.2005.10.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mech Ageing Dev        ISSN: 0047-6374            Impact factor:   5.432


  110 in total

1.  The Longitudinal Study of Aging in Human Young Adults: Knowledge Gaps and Research Agenda.

Authors:  Terrie E Moffitt; Daniel W Belsky; Andrea Danese; Richie Poulton; Avshalom Caspi
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 6.053

2.  Response to Dr. Mitnitski's and Dr. Rockwood's letter to the editor: Biological age revisited.

Authors:  Morgan E Levine
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 6.053

3.  Linking biological and cognitive aging: toward improving characterizations of developmental time.

Authors:  Stuart W S MacDonald; Correne A DeCarlo; Roger A Dixon
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.077

4.  Biological Age, Not Chronological Age, Is Associated with Late-Life Depression.

Authors:  Patrick J Brown; Melanie M Wall; Chen Chen; Morgan E Levine; Kristine Yaffe; Steven P Roose; Bret R Rutherford
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 6.053

5.  Discrepancy in Frailty Identification: Move Beyond Predictive Validity.

Authors:  Qian-Li Xue; Jing Tian; Jeremy D Walston; Paulo H M Chaves; Anne B Newman; Karen Bandeen-Roche
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 6.053

6.  Shift work, DNA methylation and epigenetic age.

Authors:  Alexandra J White; Jacob K Kresovich; Zongli Xu; Dale P Sandler; Jack A Taylor
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 7.196

Review 7.  The risks of biomarker-based epidemiology: Associations of circulating calcium levels with age, mortality, and frailty vary substantially across populations.

Authors:  Alan A Cohen; Véronique Legault; Georg Fuellen; Tamàs Fülöp; Linda P Fried; Luigi Ferrucci
Journal:  Exp Gerontol       Date:  2017-07-16       Impact factor: 4.032

8.  Construction of an integral formula of biological age for a healthy Chinese population using principle component analysis.

Authors:  W-G Zhang; X-J Bai; X-F Sun; G-Y Cai; X-Y Bai; S-Y Zhu; M Zhang; X-M Chen
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 4.075

9.  Quantification of biological aging in young adults.

Authors:  Daniel W Belsky; Avshalom Caspi; Renate Houts; Harvey J Cohen; David L Corcoran; Andrea Danese; HonaLee Harrington; Salomon Israel; Morgan E Levine; Jonathan D Schaefer; Karen Sugden; Ben Williams; Anatoli I Yashin; Richie Poulton; Terrie E Moffitt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Ageing in a variable habitat: environmental stress affects senescence in parasite resistance in St Kilda Soay sheep.

Authors:  Adam D Hayward; Alastair J Wilson; Jill G Pilkington; Josephine M Pemberton; Loeske E B Kruuk
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-07-08       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.