Literature DB >> 16317484

Low Maruyama index surgery for gastric cancer: blinded reanalysis of the Dutch D1-D2 trial.

K C M J Peeters1, S A Hundahl, E Klein Kranenbarg, H Hartgrink, C J H van de Velde.   

Abstract

A quantitative estimate of residual nodal disease after gastric cancer surgery, the Maruyama index of unresected disease (MI), proved to be a strong independent predictor of survival in a large U.S. adjuvant chemoradiation study in which surgical undertreatment was frequent. Data from the Dutch D1-D2 Lymphadenectomy Trial permit an opportunity to assess the prognostic value of this variable in a cohort with lower-stage disease treated with minimum D-1 lymphadenectomy and no adjuvant chemoradiation. Blinded to survival, and excluding those cases with missing information, the MI was calculated for 648 of the original 711 patients treated with curative intent. Survival was assessed by log-rank and multivariate Cox regression analysis. All patients have been followed for a minimum of 11 years. Overall Dutch trial findings were not affected by the absence of 63 cases with incomplete data. As expected, the median MI was 26, much lower than in the previous U.S. study. In contrast to the D level, MI < 5 proved to be a strong predictor of survival by both univariate and multivariate analysis. The MI was an independent predictor of both overall survival [P = 0.016; hazard ratio (HR) = 1.45; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.07-1.95] and relapse risk (P = 0.010; HR = 1.72; 95% CI 1.14-2.60). A strong dose-response reaction with respect to the MI and survival was also observed. We conclude that in this trial low-MI surgery is associated with enhanced survival, whereas outside of certain subgroups routine D2 lymphadenectomy is not. This observation suggests that surgeons might have more of an impact on patient survival by achieving a low-MI operation than a particular D level. A compelling dose-response effect reveals that the MI is a quantitative yardstick for assessing the adequacy of lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16317484     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-005-7907-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  22 in total

1.  Risk factors for surgical treatment in the Dutch Gastric Cancer Trial.

Authors:  M Sasako
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Randomized comparison of R1 and R2 gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma.

Authors:  D M Dent; M V Madden; S K Price
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Postoperative morbidity and mortality after D1 and D2 resections for gastric cancer: preliminary results of the MRC randomised controlled surgical trial. The Surgical Cooperative Group.

Authors:  A Cuschieri; P Fayers; J Fielding; J Craven; J Bancewicz; V Joypaul; P Cook
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-04-13       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Radical surgery (R2 resection) for gastric cancer. A multivariate analysis.

Authors:  P Lisborg; G Jatzko; M Horn; H J Neumann; M Müller; H Stettner; H Denk
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 2.423

5.  Evaluation of the Maruyama computer program accuracy for preoperative estimation of lymph node metastases from gastric cancer.

Authors:  S Guadagni; G de Manzoni; M Catarci; M Valenti; G Amicucci; G De Bernardinis; C Cordiano; M Carboni; K Maruyama
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Extended lymph-node dissection for gastric cancer.

Authors:  J J Bonenkamp; J Hermans; M Sasako; C J van de Velde; K Welvaart; I Songun; S Meyer; J T Plukker; P Van Elk; H Obertop; D J Gouma; J J van Lanschot; C W Taat; P W de Graaf; M F von Meyenfeldt; H Tilanus
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-03-25       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Preoperative assessment of lymph node metastases in patients with gastric cancer: evaluation of the Maruyama computer program.

Authors:  E Bollschweiler; K Boettcher; A H Hoelscher; M Sasako; T Kinoshita; K Maruyama; J R Siewert
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Computer analysis in making preoperative decisions: a rational approach to lymph node dissection in gastric cancer patients.

Authors:  G H Kampschöer; K Maruyama; C J van de Velde; M Sasako; T Kinoshita; K Okabayashi
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 9.  Pancreas-preserving total gastrectomy for proximal gastric cancer.

Authors:  K Maruyama; M Sasako; T Kinoshita; T Sano; H Katai; K Okajima
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1995 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Patient survival after D1 and D2 resections for gastric cancer: long-term results of the MRC randomized surgical trial. Surgical Co-operative Group.

Authors:  A Cuschieri; S Weeden; J Fielding; J Bancewicz; J Craven; V Joypaul; M Sydes; P Fayers
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  22 in total

Review 1.  Gastric cancer surgery: an American perspective on the current options and standards.

Authors:  Joyce Wong; Patrick Jackson
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2011-03

2.  Impact of hospital volume on recurrence and survival after surgery for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Peter C Enzinger; Jacqueline K Benedetti; Jeffrey A Meyerhardt; Sheryl McCoy; Scott A Hundahl; John S Macdonald; Charles S Fuchs
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Improved regional control and survival with "low Maruyama Index" surgery in gastric cancer: autopsy findings from the Dutch D1-D2 Trial.

Authors:  Scott A Hundahl; Koen C M J Peeters; E Klein Kranenbarg; Henk Hartgrink; Cornelis J H van de Velde
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2007-06-25       Impact factor: 7.370

4.  The beginning of a new era: East meets West more comfortably regarding lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer. Japan will finally drop the surgery-alone arm in its pursuit of a multimodal treatment strategy.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Kodera
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 7.370

5.  Accomplishments in 2007 in the management of localized gastric cancer.

Authors:  Cornelis J H van de Velde; Al B Benson
Journal:  Gastrointest Cancer Res       Date:  2008-05

Review 6.  Surgical management of gastric cancer: the East vs. West perspective.

Authors:  Maki Yamamoto; Omar M Rashid; Joyce Wong
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2015-02

Review 7.  Clinical significance of lymphadenectomy in patients with gastric cancer.

Authors:  Dezső Tóth; János Plósz; Miklós Török
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2016-02-15

8.  Evaluation of the adequacy of lymph node dissection in pylorus-preserving gastrectomy for early gastric cancer using the maruyama index.

Authors:  Moon-Won Yoo; Do Joong Park; Hye Seong Ahn; Sang-Ho Jeong; Hyuk-Joon Lee; Woo Ho Kim; Hyung-Ho Kim; Kuhn Uk Lee; Han-Kwang Yang
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 9.  Gastric cancer: Current status of lymph node dissection.

Authors:  Maurizio Degiuli; Giovanni De Manzoni; Alberto Di Leo; Domenico D'Ugo; Erica Galasso; Daniele Marrelli; Roberto Petrioli; Karol Polom; Franco Roviello; Francesco Santullo; Mario Morino
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Gastric cancer.

Authors:  Henk H Hartgrink; Edwin P M Jansen; Nicole C T van Grieken; Cornelis J H van de Velde
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2009-07-20       Impact factor: 79.321

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.