Literature DB >> 16317189

"Keep your eyes on the prize": reference points and racial differences in assessing progress toward equality.

Richard P Eibach1, Joyce Ehrlinger.   

Abstract

White Americans tend to perceive greater progress toward racial equality than do ethnic minorities. Correlational evidence (Study 1) and two experimental manipulations of framing (Studies 2 and 3) supported the hypothesis that this perception gap is associated with different reference points the two groups spontaneously use to assess progress, with Whites anchoring on comparisons with the past and ethnic minorities anchoring on ideal standards. Consistent with the hypothesis that the groups anchor on different reference points, the gap in perceptions of progress was affected by the time participants spent deliberating about the topic (Study 4). Implications for survey methods and political conflict are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16317189     DOI: 10.1177/0146167205279585

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull        ISSN: 0146-1672


  5 in total

1.  An experimental investigation of possible memory biases affecting support for racial health care policy.

Authors:  Philip J Mazzocco; Ryan P Brunner
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Eyes on the prize: The longitudinal benefits of goal focus on progress toward a weight loss goal.

Authors:  Kyle E Conlon; Joyce Ehrlinger; Richard P Eibach; A William Crescioni; Jessica L Alquist; Mary A Gerend; Gareth R Dutton
Journal:  J Exp Soc Psychol       Date:  2011-07

3.  Intergroup consensus/disagreement in support of group-based hierarchy: an examination of socio-structural and psycho-cultural factors.

Authors:  I-Ching Lee; Felicia Pratto; Blair T Johnson
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  Testing the efficacy of three informational interventions for reducing misperceptions of the Black-White wealth gap.

Authors:  Bennett Callaghan; Leilah Harouni; Cydney H Dupree; Michael W Kraus; Jennifer A Richeson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-09-21       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Ideology selectively shapes attention to inequality.

Authors:  Hannah B Waldfogel; Jennifer Sheehy-Skeffington; Oliver P Hauser; Arnold K Ho; Nour S Kteily
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 11.205

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.