Literature DB >> 16317183

Developing optimal search strategies for retrieving clinically relevant qualitative studies in EMBASE.

Leslie A Walters1, Nancy L Wilczynski, R Brian Haynes.   

Abstract

Qualitative researchers address many issues relevant to patient health care. Their studies appear in an array of journals, making literature searching difficult. Large databases such as EMBASE provide a means of retrieving qualitative research, but these studies represent only a minuscule fraction of published articles, making electronic retrieval problematic. Little work has been done on developing search strategies for the detection of qualitative studies. The objective of this study was to develop optimal search strategies to retrieve qualitative studies in EMBASE for the 2000 publishing year. The authors conducted an analytic survey, comparing hand searches of journals with retrievals from EMBASE for candidate search terms and combinations. Search strategies reached peak sensitivities at 94.2% and peak specificities of 99.7%. Combining search terms to optimize the combination of sensitivity and specificity resulted in values over 89% for both. The authors identified search strategies with high performance for retrieving qualitative studies in EMBASE.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16317183     DOI: 10.1177/1049732305284027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Health Res        ISSN: 1049-7323


  25 in total

1.  Managing large-volume literature searches in research synthesis studies.

Authors:  Nancy L Havill; Jennifer Leeman; Julia Shaw-Kokot; Kathleen Knafl; Jamie Crandell; Margarete Sandelowski
Journal:  Nurs Outlook       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 3.250

Review 2.  Reducing youth screen time: qualitative metasynthesis of findings on barriers and facilitators.

Authors:  Karl E Minges; Neville Owen; Jo Salmon; Ariana Chao; David W Dunstan; Robin Whittemore
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.267

Review 3.  Meta-synthesis of qualitative research: the challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Mohammed A Mohammed; Rebekah J Moles; Timothy F Chen
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2016-04-06

4.  Outcomes valued by people living with dementia and their care partners: protocol for a qualitative systematic review and synthesis.

Authors:  Laura Booi; Alison Wheatley; Greta Brunskill; Sube Banerjee; Jill Manthorpe; Louise Robinson; Claire Bamford
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 5.  Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.

Authors:  Sarah J Brown; Grace J Carter; Gemma Halliwell; Katherine Brown; Rachel Caswell; Emma Howarth; Gene Feder; Lorna O'Doherty
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-10-04

6.  Barriers to primary care clinician adherence to clinical guidelines for the management of low back pain: protocol of a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies.

Authors:  Susan C Slade; Peter Kent; Tracey Bucknall; Elizabeth Molloy; Shilpa Patel; Rachelle Buchbinder
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 7.  Qualitative systematic reviews of treatment burden in stroke, heart failure and diabetes - methodological challenges and solutions.

Authors:  Katie Gallacher; Bhautesh Jani; Deborah Morrison; Sara Macdonald; David Blane; Patricia Erwin; Carl R May; Victor M Montori; David T Eton; Fiona Smith; G David Batty; David G Batty; Frances S Mair
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 4.615

8.  Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews.

Authors:  James Thomas; Angela Harden
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2008-07-10       Impact factor: 4.615

9.  GPs' perspectives on the management of patients with multimorbidity: systematic review and synthesis of qualitative research.

Authors:  Carol Sinnott; Sheena Mc Hugh; John Browne; Colin Bradley
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Benefits and barriers to participation in colorectal cancer screening: a protocol for a systematic review and synthesis of qualitative studies.

Authors:  Gladys N Honein-Abouhaidar; Monika Kastner; Vincent Vuong; Laure Perrier; Linda Rabeneck; Jill Tinmouth; Sharon Straus; Nancy N Baxter
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.