Literature DB >> 16316756

Neosis--a paradigm of self-renewal in cancer.

Rengaswami Rajaraman1, Murali M Rajaraman, Selva R Rajaraman, Duane L Guernsey.   

Abstract

We recently described a novel form of cell division termed neosis, which appears to be the mode of escape of cells from senescence and is involved in the neoplastic transformation and progression of tumors (Cancer Biol & Therap 2004;3:207-18). Neosis is a parasexual somatic reduction division and is characterized by (1) DNA damage-induced senescence/mitotic crisis and polyploidization, (2) followed by production of aneuploid daughter cells via nuclear budding, (3) asymmetric cytokinesis and cellularization conferring extended, but, limited mitotic life span to the offspring, and (4) is repeated several times during tumor growth. The immediate neotic progeny are termed the Raju cells, which seem to transiently display stem cell properties. The Raju cells immediately undergo symmetric mitotic division and become mature tumor cells. Exposure of tumor cells to genotoxic agents yields neosis-derived Raju cell progenies that are resistant to genotoxins, thus contributing to the recurrence of drug-resistant tumor growth. Similar events have been described in the literature under different names through several decades, but have been neglected due to the lack of appreciation of the significance of this process in cancer biology. Here we review and interpret the literature in the light of our observations and the recent advances in self-renewal in cancer. Neosis paradigm of self-renewal of cancer growth is consistent with the telomere attrition, aging and origin of cancer cells after reactivation of telomerase, and constitutes an alternative to the cancer stem cell hypothesis. We summarize the arguments favoring Raju cells and not cancer stem cells, as the source of self-renewal in cancer and present a comprehensive hypothesis of carcinogenesis, encompassing various aspects of cancer biology including senescence, tumor suppressor genes, oncogenes, cell cycle checkpoints, genomic instability, polyploidy and aneuploidy, natural selection, apoptosis, endoapoptosis, development of resistance to radiotherapy and chemotherapy leading tumor progression into malignancy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16316756     DOI: 10.1016/j.cellbi.2005.10.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Biol Int        ISSN: 1065-6995            Impact factor:   3.612


  36 in total

1.  The evolution of meiosis from mitosis.

Authors:  Adam S Wilkins; Robin Holliday
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Role of senescence and mitotic catastrophe in cancer therapy.

Authors:  Richa Singh; Jasmine George; Yogeshwer Shukla
Journal:  Cell Div       Date:  2010-01-21       Impact factor: 5.130

Review 3.  Therapeutic resistance and cancer recurrence mechanisms: Unfolding the story of tumour coming back.

Authors:  Mohammad Javad Dehghan Esmatabadi; Babak Bakhshinejad; Fatemeh Movahedi Motlagh; Sadegh Babashah; Majid Sadeghizadeh
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.826

Review 4.  Giants and monsters: Unexpected characters in the story of cancer recurrence.

Authors:  Shai White-Gilbertson; Christina Voelkel-Johnson
Journal:  Adv Cancer Res       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 6.242

Review 5.  Docetaxel-induced polyploidization may underlie chemoresistance and disease relapse.

Authors:  Angela Ogden; Padmashree C G Rida; Beatrice S Knudsen; Omer Kucuk; Ritu Aneja
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2015-07-13       Impact factor: 8.679

6.  Genetic and pharmacological inhibition of acid ceramidase prevents asymmetric cell division by neosis.

Authors:  Shai White-Gilbertson; Ping Lu; James S Norris; Christina Voelkel-Johnson
Journal:  J Lipid Res       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 5.922

7.  Generation of cancer stem-like cells through the formation of polyploid giant cancer cells.

Authors:  S Zhang; I Mercado-Uribe; Z Xing; B Sun; J Kuang; J Liu
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2013-03-25       Impact factor: 9.867

8.  Some chemotherapeutics-treated colon cancer cells display a specific phenotype being a combination of stem-like and senescent cell features.

Authors:  H Was; J Czarnecka; A Kominek; K Barszcz; T Bernas; K Piwocka; B Kaminska
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 4.742

Review 9.  New insights into p53 signaling and cancer cell response to DNA damage: implications for cancer therapy.

Authors:  Razmik Mirzayans; Bonnie Andrais; April Scott; David Murray
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2012-07-15

10.  Role of p16(INK4A) in Replicative Senescence and DNA Damage-Induced Premature Senescence in p53-Deficient Human Cells.

Authors:  Razmik Mirzayans; Bonnie Andrais; Gavin Hansen; David Murray
Journal:  Biochem Res Int       Date:  2012-08-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.