Literature DB >> 16316273

The Great Eight competencies: a criterion-centric approach to validation.

Dave Bartram1.   

Abstract

The author presents results of a meta-analysis of 29 validation studies (N=4,861) that uses the Great Eight competency factors (Kurz & Bartram, 2002) as the criterion measurement framework. Predictors of the Great Eight competencies based only on personality scales show moderate to good correlations with line-manager ratings for all 8 of the competencies. On their own, ability tests correlate with 4 of the 8 competencies, and together ability and personality data yield operational validities ranging from 0.20 to 0.44 for the 8 competencies. Operational validities for aggregated predictors with aggregated criteria were estimated to be 0.53. The value of differentiating the criterion space and of relating predictor variables to criterion variables in a one-to-one fashion is discussed. ((c) 2005 APA, all rights reserved).

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16316273     DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1185

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Psychol        ISSN: 0021-9010


  5 in total

Review 1.  Cultures and Persons: Characterizing National and Other Types of Cultural Difference Can Also Aid Our Understanding and Prediction of Individual Variability.

Authors:  Peter Bevington Smith; Michael Harris Bond
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-11-29

2.  Five-Factor Personality Inventories Have a Competence-Related Higher-Order Factor Due to Item Phrasing.

Authors:  Martin Bäckström; Fredrik Björklund; Rebecka Persson; Ariela Costa
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-11-26

3.  SENNA Inventory for the Assessment of Social and Emotional Skills in Public School Students in Brazil: Measuring Both Identity and Self-Efficacy.

Authors:  Ricardo Primi; Daniel Santos; Oliver P John; Filip De Fruyt
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-11-25

4.  What are the key leadership competencies required by medical school deans in Uganda? A qualitative cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Patrick Kyamanywa; Peter Redding
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 0.927

5.  Does assessment type matter? A measurement invariance analysis of online and paper and pencil assessment of the Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences (CAPE).

Authors:  Marloes Vleeschouwer; Chris D Schubart; Cecile Henquet; Inez Myin-Germeys; Willemijn A van Gastel; Manon H J Hillegers; Jim J van Os; Marco P M Boks; Eske M Derks
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.