Literature DB >> 16315669

Mass screening for antimicrobial resistant Escherichia coli in dairy cows in northern New South Wales.

D Jordan1, S G Morris, P Gill, L M Andersen, A Chowdhury, A E Stevenson, S A Spence.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe aspects of the epidemiology of antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli shed in the faeces of milking cows in a dairying region of New South Wales.
DESIGN: A survey based on multi-stage sampling with repeated measures made within herds for estimating within-herd correlation of resistance status, and with repeated measures made on identical specimens for estimating test-retest reliability. PROCEDURE: From a population of 110 dairy herds, 30 were selected at random and from each herd between 5 and 10 faecal specimens were obtained from fresh manure pats. E coli from faecal specimens were grown on hydrophobic grid membrane filters (HGMF) and replicated onto chromogenic agar and agar containing antimicrobials (gentamicin, ampicillin, tetracycline and sulfamethoxazole). Image analysis was used to assess colony growth. Data were analysed descriptively, by generalised linear mixed models and by Taylor series linearisation to account for attributes of the survey design.
RESULTS: Of the 10,279 E coli isolates assessed, 91% expressed no resistance, 7.3% were resistant to sulfamethoxazole, 3.6% to tetracycline, 2.2% to ampicillin and 0.09% to gentamicin. The most common multiple resistance phenotype was ampicillin-tetracycline-sulfamethoxazole (1.8% of isolates). Most multiple resistant isolates appeared clustered within particular herds but were too rare to obtain valid estimates of variance, confidence intervals or intra-herd correlation. The estimated proportion of isolates in the population that were susceptible to all four antimicrobials was 97% (95% CI: 91% to 100%) and 55% of cows had no resistance detected in faecal E coli (95% CI: 27% to 83%). Within-herd correlation of shedding status (any resistance pattern) was absent and test-retest reliability of the measurement system was estimated to be at the lower end of good (0.40) but increased to excellent (0.89) after excluding sulfamethoxazole resistance, which had a greater measurement error.
CONCLUSION: Antimicrobial resistance was uncommon in E coli in the population of dairy cows studied. HGMF and image analysis is an effective tool for detecting rare forms of resistant E coli that are not uniformly distributed in livestock populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16315669     DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.2005.tb13051.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust Vet J        ISSN: 0005-0423            Impact factor:   1.281


  2 in total

1.  Quantifying antimicrobial resistance at veal calf farms.

Authors:  Angela B Bosman; Jaap A Wagenaar; Jaap Wagenaar; Arjan Stegeman; Hans Vernooij; Dik Mevius
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Effect of Antimicrobial Consumption and Production Type on Antibacterial Resistance in the Bovine Respiratory and Digestive Tract.

Authors:  Boudewijn Catry; Jeroen Dewulf; Dominiek Maes; Bart Pardon; Benedicte Callens; Mia Vanrobaeys; Geert Opsomer; Aart de Kruif; Freddy Haesebrouck
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.