BACKGROUND: High-grade astrocytomas (HGA) carry a dismal prognosis and compose nearly 20% of all childhood brain tumors. The role of high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) in the treatment of HGA remains unclear. METHODS: In a nationwide study, The Children's Cancer Group (CCG) prospectively evaluated 102 children with HGA and postoperative residual disease for efficacy and toxicity of four courses of HDCT before radiotherapy (RT). Patients were randomly assigned to one of three couplets of drugs: carboplatin/etoposide (Regimen A), ifosfamide/etoposide (Regimen B), or cyclophosphamide/etoposide (Regimen C). After HDCT, all patients were to receive local RT followed by lomustine and vincristine. Twenty-six patients were excluded after central neuroradiographic review (n = 8) or pathology review (n = 18). RESULTS: Of 76 evaluable patients (median age, 11.95 yrs; range, 3-20 yrs), 30 patients relapsed during HDCT, and 11 others did not complete HDCT because of toxicity. Nonhematologic serious toxicities were common (29%), and 21% of patients did not receive RT. Objective response rates were not associated with amount of residual disease and did not statistically differ between regimens: 27% (Regimen A), 8% (Regimen B), and 29% (Regimen C). Overall survival (OS) was 24% +/- 5% at 5 years and did not differ between groups. Median time to an event was longest for Regimen A (283 days compared with 83 and 91 days for Regimens B and C, respectively). The five-year, event-free survival (EFS) rate for all patients was 8% +/- 3% and 14% +/- 7% for Regimen A (P = 0.07). CONCLUSIONS:OS and EFS were not affected by histologic grade. Patients who responded to HDCT had a nominally higher survival rate (P = 0.03 for trend). The authors conclude that these commonly used HDCT regimens provide no additional clinical benefit to conventional treatment in HGA, regardless of the amount of measurable residual tumor. Copyright 2005 American Cancer Society.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: High-grade astrocytomas (HGA) carry a dismal prognosis and compose nearly 20% of all childhood brain tumors. The role of high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) in the treatment of HGA remains unclear. METHODS: In a nationwide study, The Children's Cancer Group (CCG) prospectively evaluated 102 children with HGA and postoperative residual disease for efficacy and toxicity of four courses of HDCT before radiotherapy (RT). Patients were randomly assigned to one of three couplets of drugs: carboplatin/etoposide (Regimen A), ifosfamide/etoposide (Regimen B), or cyclophosphamide/etoposide (Regimen C). After HDCT, all patients were to receive local RT followed by lomustine and vincristine. Twenty-six patients were excluded after central neuroradiographic review (n = 8) or pathology review (n = 18). RESULTS: Of 76 evaluable patients (median age, 11.95 yrs; range, 3-20 yrs), 30 patients relapsed during HDCT, and 11 others did not complete HDCT because of toxicity. Nonhematologic serious toxicities were common (29%), and 21% of patients did not receive RT. Objective response rates were not associated with amount of residual disease and did not statistically differ between regimens: 27% (Regimen A), 8% (Regimen B), and 29% (Regimen C). Overall survival (OS) was 24% +/- 5% at 5 years and did not differ between groups. Median time to an event was longest for Regimen A (283 days compared with 83 and 91 days for Regimens B and C, respectively). The five-year, event-free survival (EFS) rate for all patients was 8% +/- 3% and 14% +/- 7% for Regimen A (P = 0.07). CONCLUSIONS: OS and EFS were not affected by histologic grade. Patients who responded to HDCT had a nominally higher survival rate (P = 0.03 for trend). The authors conclude that these commonly used HDCT regimens provide no additional clinical benefit to conventional treatment in HGA, regardless of the amount of measurable residual tumor. Copyright 2005 American Cancer Society.
Authors: Eric Bouffet; Jeffrey C Allen; James M Boyett; Allen Yates; Floyd Gilles; Peter C Burger; Richard L Davis; Laurence E Becker; Ian F Pollack; Jonathan L Finlay Journal: J Neurosurg Pediatr Date: 2015-12-18 Impact factor: 2.375
Authors: Leigh Marcus; Robert Murphy; Elizabeth Fox; Cynthia McCully; Raphael Cruz; Katherine E Warren; Thorsten Meyer; Edward McNiff; Frank M Balis; Brigitte C Widemann Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2011-06-26 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: Ian F Pollack; Regina I Jakacki; Lisa H Butterfield; Ronald L Hamilton; Ashok Panigrahy; Daniel P Normolle; Angela K Connelly; Sharon Dibridge; Gary Mason; Theresa L Whiteside; Hideho Okada Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2016-09-13 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Philip J O'Halloran; Michael Farrell; John Caird; Michael Capra; David O'Brien Journal: Childs Nerv Syst Date: 2013-01-15 Impact factor: 1.475