Literature DB >> 16314892

PSA testing: an evolving relationship with prostate cancer screening.

J Constantinou1, M R Feneley.   

Abstract

PSA testing has made prostate cancer screening a reality for men in many parts of the world, but its benefit for men's health continues to be debated. In men exposed to PSA testing, there has been a well-documented change in the presentation of prostate cancer with a shift towards earlier pathological stage, not without justifiable concern about over-diagnosis by prostate biopsy. Increasingly, men now diagnosed with early stage cancer have previous PSA exposure and are selected for biopsy based on PSA change in relation to cutoff values. Some recent observations suggest that PSA may no longer be an effective marker for early stage tumours, with PSA elevation failing to discriminate tumour-specific characteristics from benign gland enlargement. Traditionally, variation in pathological stage of clinically localised prostate cancer at diagnosis has related to clinical stage, PSA and biopsy Gleason grade, but with distinctions based upon these three assessments declining and an increasing proportion of organ-confined tumours at presentation, new methods of cancer detection and prognostic assessment are now required. Molecular technologies hold great promise in this respect, and in the future biomarker signatures are likely to overshadow total PSA for guiding early diagnosis and prognostic assessment. While arguments about prostate screening will continue, owing not least to its feasibility, future debate is likely to focus increasingly on technological advances and molecular profiling of these notoriously heterogeneous tumours.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16314892     DOI: 10.1038/sj.pcan.4500838

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis        ISSN: 1365-7852            Impact factor:   5.554


  8 in total

1.  Rebuttal: Should Canadians be offered systematic prostate cancer screening? NO.

Authors:  Michel Labrecque; France Légaré; Michel Cauchon
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 2.  [Value of biomarkers in urology].

Authors:  P J Goebell; B Keck; S Wach; B Wullich
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Does educational printed material manage to change compliance with prostate cancer screening?

Authors:  Konstantinos Stamatiou; Andreas Skolarikos; Ioannis Heretis; Vaios Papadimitriou; Alevizos Alevizos; Georgios Ilias; Vasilissa Karanasiou; Anargiros Mariolis; Frank Sofras
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Label-free electrical detection using carbon nanotube-based biosensors.

Authors:  Kenzo Maehashi; Kazuhiko Matsumoto
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2009-07-08       Impact factor: 3.576

5.  Incidental detection of prostate-specific antigen-negative metastatic prostate cancer initially presented with solitary pulmonary nodule on fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography.

Authors:  Ezgi Basak Erdogan; Nur Buyukpinarbasili; Sedat Ziyade; Tolga Akman; Haci Mehmet Turk; Mehmet Aydin
Journal:  Indian J Nucl Med       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep

Review 6.  Research Progress for the Clinical Application of Circulating Tumor Cells in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment.

Authors:  Mei Yang; Xiaotian Zhang; Lixia Guo; Xiumin Liu; Jing Wu; Hongquan Zhu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Cell-cycle risk score more accurately determines the risk for metastases and death in prostatectomy patients compared with clinical features alone.

Authors:  Gregory P Swanson; Lauren Lenz; Steven Stone; Todd Cohen
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 4.104

Review 8.  Advances in stem cell research for the treatment of primary hypogonadism.

Authors:  Lu Li; Vassilios Papadopoulos
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 14.432

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.