Literature DB >> 16314767

Vaginal swabs are the specimens of choice when screening for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae: results from a multicenter evaluation of the APTIMA assays for both infections.

Julius Schachter1, Max A Chernesky, Dean E Willis, Paul M Fine, David H Martin, Deanna Fuller, Jeanne A Jordan, William Janda, Edward W Hook.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Vaginal swabs were recently U.S. Food and Drug Administration-cleared for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (GC) using Gen-Probe Incorporated's APTIMA COMBO2 Assay (AC2). We assessed the APTIMA CT Assay (ACT) for CT, APTIMA GC Assay (AGC) for GC, and AC2 for both organisms using patient- and clinician-collected vaginal swabs.
METHOD: Women attending family planning, obstetrics and gynecology, or sexually transmitted disease (STD) clinics had first-catch urines (FCUs), patient-collected vaginal swabs, clinician-collected vaginal swabs, and endocervical swabs tested by ACT, AGC, and AC2. A second endocervical swab and FCU were tested using BD ProbeTec (Becton Dickinson) for CT and GC. We calculated sensitivity and specificity using vaginal swabs to detect CT and GC.
RESULTS: Of 1,464 subjects enrolled, 180 had CT and 78 GC. ACT sensitivities and specificities for patient-collected vaginal swabs were 98.3% and 96.5%, respectively; for clinician-collected vaginal swabs, 97.2% and 95.2%, respectively. AGC sensitivities and specificities for patient-collected vaginal swabs were 96.1% and 99.3%, respectively; for clinician-collected vaginal swabs, 96.2% and 99.3%, respectively. AC2 results were similar. If an FCU tested positive for CT or GC, >94% of matching vaginal swabs were positive. Positive endocervical swabs showed slightly less concordance (>90% and >88%, respectively). More infected patients were identified using vaginal swabs than FCUs. With AC2, 171 CT-infected patients were identified using FCUs and 196 using patient-collected vaginal swabs. This difference was more pronounced for CT than for GC.
CONCLUSIONS: Vaginal swab specimens allowed sensitive and specific detection of CT and GC in the APTIMA assays. Vaginal swabs identified as many infected patients as endocervical swabs and more than FCUs, and may well be the specimen of choice for screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16314767     DOI: 10.1097/01.olq.0000190092.59482.96

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sex Transm Dis        ISSN: 0148-5717            Impact factor:   2.830


  64 in total

1.  Testing for sexually transmitted infections: a brave new world?

Authors:  R W Peeling
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.519

2.  Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2015.

Authors:  Kimberly A Workowski; Gail A Bolan
Journal:  MMWR Recomm Rep       Date:  2015-06-05

3. 

Authors:  Christina Korownyk; Roni Y Kraut; Michael R Kolber
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  Vaginal self-swabs for chlamydia and gonorrhea.

Authors:  Christina Korownyk; Roni Y Kraut; Michael R Kolber
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.275

5.  Comparison of an rRNA-based and DNA-based nucleic acid amplification test for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in trachoma.

Authors:  Jon L Yang; Julius Schachter; Jeanne Moncada; Dereje Habte; Mulat Zerihun; Jenafir I House; Zhaoxia Zhou; Kevin C Hong; Kathryn Maxey; Bruce D Gaynor; Thomas M Lietman
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-10-18       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  Cost-Effectiveness of Opt-Out Chlamydia Testing for High-Risk Young Women in the U.S.

Authors:  Kwame Owusu-Edusei; Karen W Hoover; Thomas L Gift
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 5.043

7.  From the NIH: proceedings of a workshop on the importance of self-obtained vaginal specimens for detection of sexually transmitted infections.

Authors:  Marcia M Hobbs; Barbara van der Pol; Patricia Totten; Charlotte A Gaydos; Anna Wald; Terri Warren; Rachel L Winer; Robert L Cook; Carolyn D Deal; M Elizabeth Rogers; Julius Schachter; King K Holmes; David H Martin
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.830

8.  Comparing urine samples and cervical swabs for Chlamydia testing in a female population by means of Strand Displacement Assay (SDA).

Authors:  Siren Haugland; Turid Thune; Beata Fosse; Tore Wentzel-Larsen; Stig Ove Hjelmevoll; Helge Myrmel
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 2.809

9.  Highly variable use of diagnostic methods for sexually transmitted infections-results of a nationwide survey, Germany 2005.

Authors:  Andreas Gilsdorf; Alexandra Hofmann; Osamah Hamouda; Viviane Bremer
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2010-04-19       Impact factor: 3.090

10.  Randomised controlled trial of screening for Chlamydia trachomatis to prevent pelvic inflammatory disease: the POPI (prevention of pelvic infection) trial.

Authors:  Pippa Oakeshott; Sally Kerry; Adamma Aghaizu; Helen Atherton; Sima Hay; David Taylor-Robinson; Ian Simms; Phillip Hay
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-04-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.