Literature DB >> 16313662

Using cognitive models to map relations between neuropsychological disorders and human decision-making deficits.

Eldad Yechiam1, Jerome R Busemeyer, Julie C Stout, Antoine Bechara.   

Abstract

Findings from a complex decision-making task (the Iowa gambling task) show that individuals with neuropsychological disorders are characterized by decision-making deficits that lead to maladaptive risk-taking behavior. This article describes a cognitive model that distills performance in this task into three different underlying psychological components: the relative impact of rewards and punishments on evaluations of options, the rate that the contingent payoffs are learned, and the consistency between learning and responding. Findings from 10 studies are organized by distilling the observed decision deficits into the three basic components and locating the neuropsychological disorders in this component space. The results reveal a cluster of populations characterized by making risky choices despite high attention to losses, perhaps because of difficulties in creating emotive representations. These findings demonstrate the potential contribution of cognitive models in building bridges between neuroscience and behavior.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16313662     DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01646.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  98 in total

1.  Working memory and decision-making biases in young adults with a family history of alcoholism: studies from the Oklahoma family health patterns project.

Authors:  William R Lovallo; Eldad Yechiam; Kristen H Sorocco; Andrea S Vincent; Frank L Collins
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.455

2.  Computational Models Inform Clinical Science and Assessment: An Application to Category Learning in Striatal-Damaged Patients.

Authors:  W Todd Maddox; J Vincent Filoteo; Dagmar Zeithamova
Journal:  J Math Psychol       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 2.223

3.  Similar Processes Despite Divergent Behavior in Two Commonly Used Measures of Risky Decision Making.

Authors:  Anthony J Bishara; Timothy J Pleskac; Daniel J Fridberg; Eldad Yechiam; Jesolyn Lucas; Jerome R Busemeyer; Peter R Finn; Julie C Stout
Journal:  J Behav Decis Mak       Date:  2009-10

Review 4.  Impulsivities and addictions: a multidimensional integrative framework informing assessment and interventions for substance use disorders.

Authors:  Jasmin Vassileva; Patricia J Conrod
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Mesolimbic recruitment by nondrug rewards in detoxified alcoholics: effort anticipation, reward anticipation, and reward delivery.

Authors:  James M Bjork; Ashley R Smith; Gang Chen; Daniel W Hommer
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  A formal cognitive model of the go/no-go discrimination task: evaluation and implications.

Authors:  Eldad Yechiam; Jackson Goodnight; John E Bates; Jerome R Busemeyer; Kenneth A Dodge; Gregory S Pettit; Joseph P Newman
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2006-09

7.  Impaired Decision-Making, Higher Impulsivity, and Drug Severity in Substance Dependence and Pathological Gambling.

Authors:  Theodore Krmpotich; Susan Mikulich-Gilbertson; Joseph Sakai; Laetitia Thompson; Marie T Banich; Jody Tanabe
Journal:  J Addict Med       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.702

8.  The Iowa Gambling Task in fMRI images.

Authors:  Xiangrui Li; Zhong-Lin Lu; Arnaud D'Argembeau; Marie Ng; Antoine Bechara
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  The drift diffusion model as the choice rule in reinforcement learning.

Authors:  Mads Lund Pedersen; Michael J Frank; Guido Biele
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-08

10.  Competition between learned reward and error outcome predictions in anterior cingulate cortex.

Authors:  William H Alexander; Joshua W Brown
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.