Literature DB >> 16313387

Patterning the neural crest derivatives during development of the vertebrate head: insights from avian studies.

Sophie Creuzet1, Gérard Couly, Nicole M Le Douarin.   

Abstract

Studies carried out in the avian embryo and based on the construction of quail-chick chimeras have shown that most of the skull and all the facial and visceral skeleton are derived from the cephalic neural crest (NC). Contribution of the mesoderm is limited to its occipital and (partly) to its otic domains. NC cells (NCCs) participating in membrane bones and cartilages of the vertebrate head arise from the diencephalon (posterior half only), the mesencephalon and the rhombencephalon. They can be divided into an anterior domain (extending down to r2 included) in which genes of the Hox clusters are not expressed (Hox-negative skeletogenic NC) and a posterior domain including r4 to r8 in which Hox genes of the four first paraloguous groups are expressed. The NCCs that form the facial skeleton belong exclusively to the anterior Hox-negative domain and develop from the first branchial arch (BA1). This rostral domain of the crest is designated as FSNC for facial skeletogenic neural crest. Rhombomere 3 (r3) participates modestly to both BA1 and BA2. Forced expression of Hox genes (Hoxa2, Hoxa3 and Hoxb4) in the neural fold of the anterior domain inhibits facial skeleton development. Similarly, surgical excision of these anterior Hox-negative NCCs results in the absence of facial skeleton, showing that Hox-positive NCCs cannot replace the Hox-negative domain for facial skeletogenesis. We also show that excision of the FSNC results in dramatic down-regulation of Fgf8 expression in the head, namely in ventral forebrain and in BA1 ectoderm. We have further demonstrated that exogenous FGF8 applied to the presumptive BA1 territory at the 5-6-somite stage (5-6ss) restores to a large extent facial skeleton development. The source of the cells responsible for this regeneration was shown to be r3, which is at the limit between the Hox-positive and Hox-negative domain. NCCs that respond to FGF8 by survival and proliferation are in turn necessary for the expression/maintenance of Fgf8 expression in the ectoderm. These results strongly support the emerging picture according to which the processes underlying morphogenesis of the craniofacial skeleton are regulated by epithelial-mesenchymal bidirectional crosstalk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16313387      PMCID: PMC1571568          DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2005.00485.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anat        ISSN: 0021-8782            Impact factor:   2.610


  41 in total

1.  Fgf and Bmp signals repress the expression of Bapx1 in the mandibular mesenchyme and control the position of the developing jaw joint.

Authors:  Joanne Wilson; Abigail S Tucker
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2004-02-01       Impact factor: 3.582

Review 2.  Neural crest cell plasticity and its limits.

Authors:  Nicole M Le Douarin; Sophie Creuzet; Gérard Couly; Elisabeth Dupin
Journal:  Development       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 6.868

3.  Use of fluorescent dextran conjugates as a long-term marker of osteogenic neural crest in frogs.

Authors:  Joshua B Gross; James Hanken
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.780

4.  Neural crest cells provide species-specific patterning information in the developing branchial skeleton.

Authors:  Abigail S Tucker; Andrew Lumsden
Journal:  Evol Dev       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.930

5.  A distinct Hox code for the branchial region of the vertebrate head.

Authors:  P Hunt; M Gulisano; M Cook; M H Sham; A Faiella; D Wilkinson; E Boncinelli; R Krumlauf
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-10-31       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  The role of the neural crest in patterning of avian cranial skeletal, connective, and muscle tissues.

Authors:  D M Noden
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 3.582

Review 7.  Patterning the cranial neural crest: hindbrain segmentation and Hox gene plasticity.

Authors:  P A Trainor; R Krumlauf
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 34.870

8.  Patterning the vertebrate head: murine Hox 2 genes mark distinct subpopulations of premigratory and migrating cranial neural crest.

Authors:  P Hunt; D Wilkinson; R Krumlauf
Journal:  Development       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 6.868

9.  Segmental origin and migration of neural crest cells in the hindbrain region of the chick embryo.

Authors:  A Lumsden; N Sprawson; A Graham
Journal:  Development       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 6.868

10.  Molecular shaping of the beak.

Authors:  Ping Wu; Ting-Xin Jiang; Sanong Suksaweang; Randall Bruce Widelitz; Cheng-Ming Chuong
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-09-03       Impact factor: 63.714

View more
  63 in total

Review 1.  Cranial neural crest cells on the move: their roles in craniofacial development.

Authors:  Dwight R Cordero; Samantha Brugmann; Yvonne Chu; Ruchi Bajpai; Maryam Jame; Jill A Helms
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2010-12-10       Impact factor: 2.802

2.  Influence of mesodermal Fgf8 on the differentiation of neural crest-derived postganglionic neurons.

Authors:  Yiju Chen; Anne M Moon; Gary O Gaufo
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 3.582

3.  The Pax3 and Pax7 paralogs cooperate in neural and neural crest patterning using distinct molecular mechanisms, in Xenopus laevis embryos.

Authors:  Frédérique Maczkowiak; Stéphanie Matéos; Estee Wang; Daniel Roche; Richard Harland; Anne H Monsoro-Burq
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 3.582

Review 4.  Regional differences in neural crest morphogenesis.

Authors:  Bryan R Kuo; Carol A Erickson
Journal:  Cell Adh Migr       Date:  2010 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 3.405

5.  A novel ciliopathic skull defect arising from excess neural crest.

Authors:  Jacqueline M Tabler; Christopher P Rice; Karen J Liu; John B Wallingford
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 3.582

Review 6.  The role of foxi family transcription factors in the development of the ear and jaw.

Authors:  Renée K Edlund; Onur Birol; Andrew K Groves
Journal:  Curr Top Dev Biol       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 4.897

7.  Close association of olfactory placode precursors and cranial neural crest cells does not predestine cell mixing.

Authors:  Maegan V Harden; Luisa Pereiro; Mirana Ramialison; Jochen Wittbrodt; Megana K Prasad; Andrew S McCallion; Kathleen E Whitlock
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 3.780

Review 8.  The integumentary skeleton of tetrapods: origin, evolution, and development.

Authors:  Matthew K Vickaryous; Jean-Yves Sire
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.610

9.  Modeling neural crest induction, melanocyte specification, and disease-related pigmentation defects in hESCs and patient-specific iPSCs.

Authors:  Yvonne Mica; Gabsang Lee; Stuart M Chambers; Mark J Tomishima; Lorenz Studer
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 9.423

10.  Epigenetic regulation of caspase-3 gene expression in rat brain development.

Authors:  Alexander Yakovlev; Maryam Khafizova; Ziedulla Abdullaev; Dmitri Loukinov; Alexei Kondratyev
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 3.688

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.