Dennis R Ownby1. 1. Department of Pediatrics, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, Georgia 30912, USA. downby@mail.mcg.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To examine current trends of asthma prevalence, diagnosis, and utilization of care in rural areas, increase awareness about asthma disease burden, and provide general recommendations for improving care in this setting. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE searches were conducted for articles published from 1966 onward, with human subjects and the English language as descriptors. Other terms used included undiagnosed frequent wheezing, hygiene hypothesis, atopic sensitization, endotoxin, telemedicine, and asthma prevalence and care in rural or urban areas. STUDY SELECTION: Review and original research studies that reported on asthma care in rural areas were selected for evaluation. RESULTS: Contrary to common belief, evidence suggests that asthma prevalence of rural and urban youth is comparable in the United States and may indeed be higher in rural areas. Data are not available to determine prevalence rates for rural adults in the United States. This review presents data suggesting that the utilization of asthma care among rural and urban residents may not be comparable. Rural residents are confronted with certain barriers to care that are not as common in the urban setting. These include lack of health care insurance, geographic obstacles to obtaining care, inability of getting suitable appointments, scarcity of health care professionals, and poor access to information about asthma. CONCLUSIONS: Current literature suggests that asthma in rural areas may be underdiagnosed and deserves additional study. Improving formal and continuing education of health care professionals, compensating for health care shortages by using existing resources, and facilitating patient support and education are some of the ways to address the special needs faced by rural residents.
OBJECTIVES: To examine current trends of asthma prevalence, diagnosis, and utilization of care in rural areas, increase awareness about asthma disease burden, and provide general recommendations for improving care in this setting. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE searches were conducted for articles published from 1966 onward, with human subjects and the English language as descriptors. Other terms used included undiagnosed frequent wheezing, hygiene hypothesis, atopic sensitization, endotoxin, telemedicine, and asthma prevalence and care in rural or urban areas. STUDY SELECTION: Review and original research studies that reported on asthma care in rural areas were selected for evaluation. RESULTS: Contrary to common belief, evidence suggests that asthma prevalence of rural and urban youth is comparable in the United States and may indeed be higher in rural areas. Data are not available to determine prevalence rates for rural adults in the United States. This review presents data suggesting that the utilization of asthma care among rural and urban residents may not be comparable. Rural residents are confronted with certain barriers to care that are not as common in the urban setting. These include lack of health care insurance, geographic obstacles to obtaining care, inability of getting suitable appointments, scarcity of health care professionals, and poor access to information about asthma. CONCLUSIONS: Current literature suggests that asthma in rural areas may be underdiagnosed and deserves additional study. Improving formal and continuing education of health care professionals, compensating for health care shortages by using existing resources, and facilitating patient support and education are some of the ways to address the special needs faced by rural residents.
Authors: Robbie D Pesek; Perla A Vargas; Jill S Halterman; Stacie M Jones; Andy McCracken; Tamara T Perry Journal: Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 6.347
Authors: Christine Loftus; Michael Yost; Paul Sampson; Griselda Arias; Elizabeth Torres; Victoria Breckwich Vasquez; Parveen Bhatti; Catherine Karr Journal: Environ Res Date: 2014-11-27 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: Henry N Young; S Nadra Havican; Sara Griesbach; Joshua M Thorpe; Betty A Chewning; Christine A Sorkness Journal: Telemed J E Health Date: 2012-06-01 Impact factor: 3.536
Authors: Christine Loftus; Zahra Afsharinejad; Paul Sampson; Sverre Vedal; Elizabeth Torres; Griselda Arias; Maria Tchong-French; Catherine Karr Journal: Int J Hyg Environ Health Date: 2019-09-19 Impact factor: 5.840
Authors: Francisco-Javier Gonzalez-Barcala; Ramon de la Fuente-Cid; Mónica Tafalla; Javier Nuevo; Francisco Caamaño-Isorna Journal: Multidiscip Respir Med Date: 2012-10-02