Literature DB >> 16311492

Optimal design features for surveying low-income populations.

Doren D Fredrickson1, Teresa L Jones, Craig A Molgaard, Claudia G Carman, Jay Schukman, S Edwards Dismuke, Elizabeth Ablah.   

Abstract

Improving Medicaid program effectiveness for underserved populations is hampered by low survey response rates. This study determined how to maximize Medicaid consumer satisfaction survey response rates to the Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study (CAHPS) survey. In a public immunization clinic, 8 focus groups and 15 extended interviews were used to assess consumer-preferred survey design features and incentives. To test hypotheses, we conducted the following trial. Out of 10,733 total participants in a Kansas Medicaid managed care plan, 3,685 eligible for CAHPS were unduplicated by household. After randomization of the 968 households with valid addresses to one of three groups, a controlled trial was conducted to assess response rates to CAHPS survey formats and incentives. Response rates were 35% for a standard mailing, 44% for a user-friendly low-literacy mailing, and 64% for a user-friendly low-literacy mailing with a $10 contingent incentive. Both experimental arms significantly improved response compared with the control; the response rate of the mailing group with the incentive was higher than the response rate of the group receiving that mailing without any incentive (p<0.0001). Using consumer-based preferences significantly increased response rates to this Medicaid satisfaction survey. Raising CAHPS response rates may increase validity of Medicaid consumer satisfaction information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16311492     DOI: 10.1353/hpu.2005.0096

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved        ISSN: 1049-2089


  17 in total

1.  Racial/Ethnic variation in parent perceptions of asthma.

Authors:  Ann Chen Wu; Lauren Smith; Barbara Bokhour; Katherine H Hohman; Tracy A Lieu
Journal:  Ambul Pediatr       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr

2.  Parent perceptions important for HPV vaccine initiation among low income adolescent girls.

Authors:  Stephanie A S Staras; Susan T Vadaparampil; Roshni P Patel; Elizabeth A Shenkman
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 3.641

3.  Improving Response Rates and Representation of Hard-to-Reach Groups in Family Experience Surveys.

Authors:  Sara L Toomey; Marc N Elliott; Alan M Zaslavsky; Jessica Quinn; David J Klein; Stephanie Wagner; Cassandra Thomson; Melody Wu; Sarah Onorato; Mark A Schuster
Journal:  Acad Pediatr       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 3.107

4.  Development of items to assess patients' health literacy experiences at hospitals for the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) Hospital Survey.

Authors:  Beverly A Weidmer; Cindy Brach; Mary E Slaughter; Ron D Hays
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Adapting Patient Experience Data Collection Processes for Lower Literacy Patient Populations Using Tablets at the Point of Care.

Authors:  Lina Tieu; Alicia Hobbs; Urmimala Sarkar; Erin C Nacev; Courtney R Lyles
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 6.  Consumer/patient encounters with prescription drug monitoring programs: evidence from a Medicaid population.

Authors:  Amie Goodin; Karen Blumenschein; Patricia Rippetoe Freeman; Jeffery Talbert
Journal:  Pain Physician       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.965

7.  Prevalence of Parental Misconceptions About Antibiotic Use.

Authors:  Louise Elaine Vaz; Kenneth P Kleinman; Matthew D Lakoma; M Maya Dutta-Linn; Chelsea Nahill; James Hellinger; Jonathan A Finkelstein
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2015-07-20       Impact factor: 7.124

8.  Measuring patient experiences on hospitalist and teaching services: Patient responses to a 30-day postdischarge questionnaire.

Authors:  Charlie M Wray; Andrea Flores; William V Padula; Micah T Prochaska; David O Meltzer; Vineet M Arora
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 2.960

9.  Development and evaluation of the CAHPS (Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems) survey for in-center hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  Beverly A Weidmer; Paul D Cleary; San Keller; Christian Evensen; Margarita P Hurtado; Beth Kosiak; Patricia M Gallagher; Roger Levine; Ron D Hays
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 8.860

10.  Asthma self-assessment in a Medicaid population.

Authors:  Ann C Wu; James Glauber; Charlene Gay; Tracy A Lieu
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.