Literature DB >> 16311189

Implicit motor learning of a balancing task.

A J Orrell1, F F Eves, R S W Masters.   

Abstract

This study examined the implicit learning of a balancing task. Three treatment conditions were constructed using different motor learning strategies. In two of the treatment conditions, explicit learning of the balancing task was impeded by using either an analogy or an errorless learning technique. In the third treatment condition, participants learnt the task by discovery learning, which typically results in explicit knowledge. It was hypothesised that in the analogy and errorless learning conditions, learning of the balancing task would be implicit in character. Three criteria of implicit learning were used to test this hypothesis; the accumulation of few explicit rules, robustness under secondary task loading and durability over time. Although the discovery learners acquired more explicit rules, all groups appear to have acquired the skill implicitly, in that all groups were robust to imposition of a concurrent task load and over time. Indeed, balance performance with a concurrent verbal task was better than balance performance alone. Discussion focuses on the contribution of verbal and non-verbal processes to balancing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16311189     DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2004.11.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gait Posture        ISSN: 0966-6362            Impact factor:   2.840


  13 in total

1.  Effects of variable practice and declarative knowledge on sensorimotor adaptation to rotated visual feedback.

Authors:  Susen Werner; Otmar Bock
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-03-15       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Using upper limb kinematics to assess cognitive deficits in people living with both HIV and stroke.

Authors:  Kevin D Bui; Roshan Rai; Michelle J Johnson
Journal:  IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot       Date:  2017-07

3.  Transfer of training between distinct motor tasks after stroke: implications for task-specific approaches to upper-extremity neurorehabilitation.

Authors:  Sydney Y Schaefer; Chavelle B Patterson; Catherine E Lang
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 3.919

4.  Learning new gait patterns is enhanced by specificity of training rather than progression of task difficulty.

Authors:  Chandramouli Krishnan; Aastha K Dharia; Thomas E Augenstein; Edward P Washabaugh; Courtney E Reid; Scott R Brown; Rajiv Ranganathan
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 5.  Is Implicit Motor Learning Preserved after Stroke? A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  E Kal; M Winters; J van der Kamp; H Houdijk; E Groet; C van Bennekom; E Scherder
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Does Not Facilitate Dynamic Balance Task Learning in Healthy Old Adults.

Authors:  Elisabeth Kaminski; Maike Hoff; Viola Rjosk; Christopher J Steele; Christopher Gundlach; Bernhard Sehm; Arno Villringer; Patrick Ragert
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 7.  Devices and tasks involved in the objective assessment of standing dynamic balancing - A systematic literature review.

Authors:  Bálint Petró; Alexandra Papachatzopoulou; Rita M Kiss
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Terminology, taxonomy, and facilitation of motor learning in clinical practice: protocol of a delphi study.

Authors:  Melanie Kleynen; Michel Hc Bleijlevens; Anna Jhm Beurskens; Sascha M Rasquin; Jos Halfens; Mark R Wilson; Rich S Masters; Monique A Lexis; Susy M Braun
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2013-05-17

9.  Implicit and Explicit Learning of a Sequential Postural Weight-Shifting Task in Young and Older Adults.

Authors:  Simone R Caljouw; Renee Veldkamp; Claudine J C Lamoth
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-05-24

10.  Does implicit motor learning lead to greater automatization of motor skills compared to explicit motor learning? A systematic review.

Authors:  Elmar Kal; Rens Prosée; Marinus Winters; John van der Kamp
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.