Literature DB >> 16310305

Nifedipine versus ritodrine for suppression of preterm labor. Comparison of their efficacy and secondary effects.

Vicenç Cararach1, Montse Palacio, Sergi Martínez, Pere Deulofeu, Myriam Sánchez, Teresa Cobo, Oriol Coll.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy of nifedipine and ritodrine in prolonging pregnancy beyond 48 h, 1 week and 36.0 weeks and to evaluate maternal side effects and adverse perinatal outcome. STUDY
DESIGN: Non-blinded, randomized controlled trial. Eighty patients with singleton pregnancies admitted for preterm labor with intact membranes between 22 and 35 weeks of gestation were included in the study. Preterm labor was defined as the persistence of at least two symptomatic uterine contractions within a 10 min period during 60 min after admission and despite bed rest.
RESULTS: Forty women received oral nifedipine and forty intravenous ritodrine. Two patients, one from each group, were excluded because of loss to follow-up after discharge. Therefore, 39 women in the nifedipine and the ritodrine groups, respectively, were evaluable for the final analysis. Baseline characteristics were comparable in both groups. The percentage of initial response, the speed of onset of action and the rate of successful treatment within 48 h were significantly better in the ritodrine group. However, prolongation of pregnancy beyond 7 days and 36 weeks of pregnancy was similar with a significantly lower rate of side effects in the nifedipine group.
CONCLUSIONS: In this small trial, ritodrine provided more effective tocolysis within the first 48 h than nifedipine at the doses used in this study, although with a significantly higher rate of side effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16310305     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.10.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol        ISSN: 0301-2115            Impact factor:   2.435


  8 in total

Review 1.  Nifedipine in the management of preterm labor: a systematic review and metaanalysis.

Authors:  Agustín Conde-Agudelo; Roberto Romero; Juan Pedro Kusanovic
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 2.  Calcium channel blockers for inhibiting preterm labour and birth.

Authors:  Vicki Flenady; Aleena M Wojcieszek; Dimitri N M Papatsonis; Owen M Stock; Linda Murray; Luke A Jardine; Bruno Carbonne
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-06-05

3.  Comparison of effects of nifedipine and ritodrine on maternal and fetal blood flow patterns in preterm labor.

Authors:  Baran Özhan Baykal; Sümeyra Nergiz Avcıoğlu
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2015-06-01

Review 4.  Tocolytics for delaying preterm birth: a network meta-analysis (0924).

Authors:  Amie Wilson; Victoria A Hodgetts-Morton; Ella J Marson; Alexandra D Markland; Eva Larkai; Argyro Papadopoulou; Arri Coomarasamy; Aurelio Tobias; Doris Chou; Olufemi T Oladapo; Malcolm J Price; Katie Morris; Ioannis D Gallos
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-08-10

Review 5.  Pharmacogenetics and individualizing drug treatment during pregnancy.

Authors:  David M Haas
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.533

6.  Management of preterm labor: atosiban or nifedipine?

Authors:  Roel de Heus; Eduard J H Mulder; Gerard H A Visser
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2010-08-09

7.  Cardiogenic Shock after Nifedipine Administration in a Pregnant Patient: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Ilaria Botta; Jacques Devriendt; Jose Castro Rodriguez; Marielle Morissens; Andrew Carling; Leonel Barreto Gutierrez; Thierry Preseau; David De Bels; Patrick M Honore; Sebastien Redant
Journal:  J Transl Int Med       Date:  2018-10-09

Review 8.  Tocolytic therapy for preterm delivery: systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  David M Haas; Deborah M Caldwell; Page Kirkpatrick; Jennifer J McIntosh; Nicky J Welton
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2012-10-09
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.