Literature DB >> 16310059

Pilot study on the sensitivity and specificity of in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy in the diagnosis of allergic contact dermatitis.

Susanne Astner1, Ernesto Gonzalez, Arnold Cheung, Francisca Rius-Diaz, Salvador González.   

Abstract

The validity, reproducibility, and specificity of patch-testing in the diagnosis of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) have repeatedly been addressed. In vivo reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) has been used for real-time evaluation of the histopathologic features of ACD. This pilot study was designed to determine the sensitivity and specificity of RCM in diagnosing ACD in reference to patch-testing. Sixteen participants were patch tested with allergens and control substances. Clinical scoring, digital photography, and RCM evaluation were performed at 72 hours, and RCM images were subjected to blinded evaluation. RCM evaluation parameters included stratum corneum (SC) disruption, parakeratosis, stratum spinosum (SS) and stratum granulosum (SG) spongiosis, and exocytosis. Overall, there was high specificity for all RCM features, ranging from 95.8% to 100%. Sensitivity ranged from 51.9% to 96.3%. Significant parameters with high sensitivity and specificity included spongiosis and exocytosis at the level of SS. Logistic regression analysis was performed on significant variables; P values were determined by chi2 analysis. RCM is a promising noninvasive technology for the evaluation of ACD. SC changes are not helpful in the diagnosis of ACD, although the presence of SG spongiosis and SS spongiosis shows high sensitivity in diagnosing ACD. Larger sensitivity and specificity studies are needed and the identification of ACD has to be based on a defined diagnostic algorithm. A limitation of this study is the small sample size; larger sensitivity and specificity studies are needed to confirm these findings. In addition, individual allergens have to be subjected to further evaluations in order to demonstrate the applicability of our findings for other contact allergens. In that regard, RCM may be considered as an adjunctive tool, rather than a substitute, to clinical evaluation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16310059     DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2005.08.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol        ISSN: 0190-9622            Impact factor:   11.527


  8 in total

1.  Consistency and distribution of reflectance confocal microscopy features for diagnosis of cutaneous T cell lymphoma.

Authors:  Susanne Lange-Asschenfeldt; Jasmin Babilli; Marc Beyer; Francisca Ríus-Diaz; Salvador González; Eggert Stockfleth; Martina Ulrich
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.170

2.  [Confocal laser scanning microscopy].

Authors:  S Astner; M Ulrich
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 0.751

3.  In vivo reflectance confocal microscopy: usefulness for diagnosing hair diseases.

Authors:  Lidia Rudnicka; Malgorzata Olszewska; Adriana Rakowska
Journal:  J Dermatol Case Rep       Date:  2008-12-27

Review 4.  Reflectance confocal microscopy of skin in vivo: From bench to bedside.

Authors:  Milind Rajadhyaksha; Ashfaq Marghoob; Anthony Rossi; Allan C Halpern; Kishwer S Nehal
Journal:  Lasers Surg Med       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 4.025

5.  High-definition optical coherence tomography: adapted algorithmic method for pattern analysis of inflammatory skin diseases: a pilot study.

Authors:  Marc Boone; Sarah Norrenberg; Gregor Jemec; Véronique Del Marmol
Journal:  Arch Dermatol Res       Date:  2013-01-06       Impact factor: 3.017

6.  Visualization of plasmid delivery to keratinocytes in mouse and human epidermis.

Authors:  Emilio González-González; Yeu-Chun Kim; Tycho J Speaker; Robyn P Hickerson; Ryan Spitler; James C Birchall; Maria Fernanda Lara; Rong-Hua Hu; Yanhua Liang; Nancy Kirkiles-Smith; Mark R Prausnitz; Leonard M Milstone; Christopher H Contag; Roger L Kaspar
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 7.  Monitoring treatment response in psoriasis: current perspectives on the clinical utility of reflectance confocal microscopy.

Authors:  Marina Agozzino; Cecilia Noal; Francesco Lacarrubba; Marco Ardigò
Journal:  Psoriasis (Auckl)       Date:  2017-02-20

8.  Non-invasive clinical and microscopic evaluation of the response to treatment with clobetasol cream vs. calcipotriol/betamethasone dipropionate foam in mild to moderate plaque psoriasis: an investigator-initiated, phase IV, unicentric, open, randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  O Yélamos; B Alejo; S S Ertekin; L Villa-Crespo; S Zamora-Barquero; N Martinez; M Domínguez; P Iglesias; A Herrero; J Malvehy; S Puig
Journal:  J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 9.228

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.