Literature DB >> 16309742

Invocation of coercion context in compliance communication -- power dynamics in psychiatric care.

Stefan Sjöström1.   

Abstract

This article draws on observations from ethnographic fieldwork to develop a theoretical understanding of the power dynamics in psychiatric care. The aim is to analyze how psychiatric clinicians solve compliance problems by invoking "coercion context". It is suggested that clinicians take a rather instrumental approach to laws regulating coercive intervention. Clinicians may invoke a coercion context even with voluntary patients. For example, they may use wordings that connote coercion, or they may make use of how treatment wards are set up to accommodate involuntary patients, thus stalling voluntary patients who cannot exit through locked doors. A coercion context can also be invoked to solve mundane practical problems, e.g. when clinicians talk about "coerced showers". The management of information and maintaining a suitable "awareness context" with regards to coercion is an essential feature in clinical attempts to achieve compliance from patients. In conclusion, the notion of coercion context helps explain the confusing findings from previous research about patients' apparent misconceptions of their formal legal status. Furthermore, it is argued that research that rely on decontextualised, objectifications of "coercion" risk to miss the meaning coercion is assigned in everyday clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16309742     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2005.06.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Law Psychiatry        ISSN: 0160-2527


  14 in total

1.  A cross-sectional prospective study of seclusion, restraint and involuntary medication in acute psychiatric wards: patient, staff and ward characteristics.

Authors:  Tonje Lossius Husum; Johan Håkon Bjørngaard; Arnstein Finset; Torleif Ruud
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 2.655

2.  Adherence of 13-17 Year Old Adolescents to Medicinal and Non-pharmacological Treatment in Psychiatric Inpatient Care: Special Focus on Relative Clinical and Family Factors.

Authors:  Ulla Timlin; Helinä Hakko; Kaisa Riala; Pirkko Räsänen; Helvi Kyngäs
Journal:  Child Psychiatry Hum Dev       Date:  2015-10

3.  Trust, deals and authority: community mental health professionals' experiences of influencing reluctant patients.

Authors:  Jorun Rugkåsa; Krysia Canvin; Julia Sinclair; Anna Sulman; Tom Burns
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2014-03-25

4.  Strategies for the Prevention of Violence in Institutional Care: A Qualitative Interview Study With Ward Managers.

Authors:  Martin Lindow; Lars Kjellin; Ingemar Engström; Veikko Pelto-Piri
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 4.157

5.  Fluctuating capacity and advance decision-making in Bipolar Affective Disorder - Self-binding directives and self-determination.

Authors:  Tania Gergel; Gareth S Owen
Journal:  Int J Law Psychiatry       Date:  2015-05-02

6.  Increased influence and collaboration: a qualitative study of patients' experiences of community treatment orders within an assertive community treatment setting.

Authors:  Hanne Kilen Stuen; Jorun Rugkåsa; Anne Landheim; Rolf Wynn
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Local psychiatric beds appear to decrease the use of involuntary admission: a case-registry study.

Authors:  Lars Henrik Myklebust; Knut Sørgaard; Rolf Wynn
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  Ethical challenges in connection with the use of coercion: a focus group study of health care personnel in mental health care.

Authors:  Marit Helene Hem; Bert Molewijk; Reidar Pedersen
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 2.652

9.  Key international themes in coercion.

Authors:  Andrew Molodynski; Anthony O'Brien; Jonathan Burns
Journal:  BJPsych Int       Date:  2017-08-01

10.  The significance of ethics reflection groups in mental health care: a focus group study among health care professionals.

Authors:  Marit Helene Hem; Bert Molewijk; Elisabeth Gjerberg; Lillian Lillemoen; Reidar Pedersen
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 2.652

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.