Literature DB >> 16308867

Physical, chemical and environmental properties of selected chemical alternatives for the pre-plant use of methyl bromide as soil fumigant.

Luis O Ruzo1.   

Abstract

Production and use of methyl bromide, a soil fumigant, are being restricted because of this chemical's deleterious effects on stratospheric ozone concentrations. Several products, some of which are currently used as soil fumigants, are being considered as possible replacements for methyl bromide, alone and in various combinations. Among these, 1,3-dichloropropene, methyl isothiocyanate generators such as metam-sodium, and chloropicrin are currently registered, while others such as methyl iodide and sodium azide are at different stages of the registration process. This review examines physicochemical properties, environmental fate, and metabolism of the various potential methyl bromide replacement products. Copyright (c) 2005 Society of Chemical Industry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16308867     DOI: 10.1002/ps.1135

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pest Manag Sci        ISSN: 1526-498X            Impact factor:   4.845


  8 in total

1.  Methyl Bromide Alternatives for Control of Root-knot Nematode (Meloidogyne spp.) in Tomato Production in Florida.

Authors:  Johan Desaeger; Donald W Dickson; S J Locascio
Journal:  J Nematol       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.402

2.  Daylight-activated fumigant detoxifying nanofibrous membrane based on thiol-ene click chemistry.

Authors:  Peixin Tang; Gang Sun
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 10.588

3.  Capsaicinoids, chloropicrin and sulfur mustard: possibilities for exposure biomarkers.

Authors:  Maija Pesonen; Kirsi Vähäkangas; Mia Halme; Paula Vanninen; Heikki Seulanto; Matti Hemmilä; Markku Pasanen; Tapio Kuitunen
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2010-12-20       Impact factor: 5.810

4.  Pesticide Side Effects in an Agricultural Soil Ecosystem as Measured by amoA Expression Quantification and Bacterial Diversity Changes.

Authors:  Louise Feld; Mathis Hjort Hjelmsø; Morten Schostag Nielsen; Anne Dorthe Jacobsen; Regin Rønn; Flemming Ekelund; Paul Henning Krogh; Bjarne Westergaard Strobel; Carsten Suhr Jacobsen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Effects of Soil Pre-Treatment with Basamid® Granules, Brassica juncea, Raphanus sativus, and Tagetes patula on Bacterial and Fungal Communities at Two Apple Replant Disease Sites.

Authors:  Bunlong Yim; Heike Nitt; Andreas Wrede; Samuel Jacquiod; Søren J Sørensen; Traud Winkelmann; Kornelia Smalla
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 6.  Groundwater monitoring for 1,3-dichloropropene in high fumigant use areas of North America and Europe.

Authors:  Ian J van Wesenbeeck; Steve Knowles
Journal:  Pest Manag Sci       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 4.845

7.  Control of Fungal Diseases and Fruit Yield Improvement of Strawberry Using Bacillus velezensis CE 100.

Authors:  Sarah Hong; Tae Yoon Kim; Sang-Jae Won; Jae-Hyun Moon; Henry B Ajuna; Kil Yong Kim; Young Sang Ahn
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2022-02-04

8.  Dimethyl disulfide (DMDS) as an effective soil fumigant against nematodes in China.

Authors:  Dongdong Yan; Aocheng Cao; Qiuxia Wang; Yuan Li; Ouyang Canbin; Meixia Guo; Xiaoqin Guo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.