Literature DB >> 16308102

Differential Prox-1 and CD 31 expression in mucousae, cutaneous and soft tissue vascular lesions and tumors.

Rui M Reis1, Jorge S Reis-Filho, Adhemar Longatto Filho, Stanislav Tomarev, Paula Silva, José M Lopes.   

Abstract

The study of lymphatic vessels and lymphatic tumors has been hampered with difficulty due to the overlapping morphological features between blood and lymphatic endothelial cells, as well as to the lack of specific lymphatic endothelial markers. Over the last few years, lymphatic vessels and lymphangiogenesis have received great attention owing to their putative implications in terms of metastatic dissemination and the promise of targets for lymphangiogenic therapy. Prox-1 is a nuclear transcription factor that plays a major role during embryonic lymphangiogenesis and is deemed to be a useful marker for differentiating lymphatic endothelial cells from the other blood vessels endothelial cells. Here, we describe a double-immunostaining strategy for formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues that aims at evaluating the distribution of Prox-1 and CD 31 - a cytoplasmic pan-endothelial marker - in a series of 28 mucousae, cutaneous and soft tissue vascular lesions and tumors, including hemangiomas, lymphangiomas, lymphangiectasia, and Kaposi's sarcomas. Our results showed that in non-lesional mucousae and skin, Prox-1 decorated exclusively the nuclei of endothelial cells in lymphatic vessels. Prox-1 stained almost all the benign lymphatic vascular lesions/tumors (91%) and was absent or only focally positive in 75% of blood vascular tumors. CD 31 stained endothelial cells of blood vessels of superficial and deep dermal plexuses, lymphatics, and all blood vascular lesions/tumors. Kaposi's sarcomas were all positive for both CD 31 and Prox-1 markers. In conclusion, although Prox-1 expression in vascular lesions/tumors was not entirely restricted to tumors with known lymphatic differentiation, CD 31/Prox-1 double-immunolabeling can be used as an adjunct marker to identify lymphatic vessels in routinely processed formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded samples.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16308102     DOI: 10.1016/j.prp.2005.08.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pathol Res Pract        ISSN: 0344-0338            Impact factor:   3.250


  5 in total

1.  Presence of lymphatics in a rat tendon lesion model.

Authors:  Herbert Tempfer; Alexandra Kaser-Eichberger; Stefanie Korntner; Christine Lehner; Nadja Kunkel; Andreas Traweger; Andrea Trost; Clemens Strohmaier; Barbara Bogner; Christian Runge; Daniela Bruckner; Karolina Krefft; Ludwig M Heindl; Herbert A Reitsamer; Falk Schrödl
Journal:  Histochem Cell Biol       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 4.304

2.  Surgical management of a dermal lymphatic malformation of the lower extremity.

Authors:  Lisa F Schneider; Constance M Chen; Joanna M Zurada; Robert Walther; Robert T Grant
Journal:  Can J Plast Surg       Date:  2008

Review 3.  Pathogenesis of lymphangiomas.

Authors:  Susanne Wiegand; Behfar Eivazi; Peter J Barth; Dirk Berens von Rautenfeld; Benedikt J Folz; Robert Mandic; Jochen A Werner
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2008-05-24       Impact factor: 4.064

4.  KSHV requires vCyclin to overcome replicative senescence in primary human lymphatic endothelial cells.

Authors:  Terri A DiMaio; Daniel T Vogt; Michael Lagunoff
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 6.823

5.  Evaluation of the impact of pre-operative stereotactic radiotherapy on the acute changes in histopathologic and immune marker profiles of brain metastases.

Authors:  Rupesh Kotecha; Raees Tonse; Miguel A Ramirez Menendez; Andre Williams; Zuanel Diaz; Martin C Tom; Matthew D Hall; Minesh P Mehta; Reinier Alvarez; Vitaly Siomin; Yazmin Odia; Manmeet S Ahluwalia; Michael W McDermott
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.