Literature DB >> 16308058

Impact of emergency department volume on registered nurse time at the bedside.

Cherri Hobgood1, John Villani, Robert Quattlebaum.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: We determine how emergency department (ED) registered nurses (RNs) allocate their time between various tasks and describe how RN task distribution changes as a function of various measures of ED patient volume and patient acuity.
METHODS: This is a 3-year direct observational study using a convenience sample of 63 8-hour nurse shifts. Four RN task categories were defined: (1) direct patient care, (2) indirect patient care, (3) non-RN care, and (4) personal time. Two measures of nurse workload were used, the patient-to-nurse ratio and the ED acuity index (ED acuity index=(Sigma reverse order triage scores/half hour)/total number of nurses staffing). Trained observers classified RN activity at 1-minute intervals during 8-hour shifts daily for 7 nonconsecutive 24-hour periods. RN staffing data, ED patient census, and patient triage scores were collected every half hour. Summary statistics, correlation tables, and regression analysis were used to establish relationships between RN task allocation, patients per nurse, and the ED acuity index.
RESULTS: For the 63 nursing shifts studied, on average RNs spent 25.6% of their time performing direct patient care, 48.4% on indirect patient care, 6.8% on non-RN care, and 19.1% on personal time. Regardless of the number of patients per RN, approximately twice as much time is spent on indirect patient care as direct patient care. The correlation between the ED acuity index and the patient-to-nurse ratio was 0.98.
CONCLUSION: Regardless of workload, RNs spend the majority of their time performing indirect patient care. RNs spend little time performing tasks that could be performed by ancillary staff. The patient-to-nurse ratio performs just as well as a more complicated acuity index to measure the workload of RNs within an ED.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16308058     DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2005.07.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


  7 in total

1.  Impact of antibiotic exposure patterns on selection of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in hospital settings.

Authors:  Lidia Kardas-Sloma; Pierre Yves Boëlle; Lulla Opatowski; Christian Brun-Buisson; Didier Guillemot; Laura Temime
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-07-25       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Do Emergency Nurses Spend Enough Time on Nursing Activities? The Relationship Between Actual and Expected Patient Care Nursing Time.

Authors:  Wen-Chih Fann; Bih-O Lee; Cheng-Ting Hsiao; Yu-Shan Chuan; Chiu-Ya Kuo
Journal:  J Acute Med       Date:  2019-12-01

3.  Peripatetic health-care workers as potential superspreaders.

Authors:  Laura Temime; Lulla Opatowski; Yohan Pannet; Christian Brun-Buisson; Pierre Yves Boëlle; Didier Guillemot
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-10-19       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Characteristics of Occupational Injuries in a Pharmaceutical Company in Iran.

Authors:  Abbas Rasouli; Seyed Mojtaba Hosseini; Mohammadkarim Bahadori; Ramin Ravangard
Journal:  Bull Emerg Trauma       Date:  2018-04

5.  Time series analysis of emergency department length of stay per 8-hour shift.

Authors:  Niels K Rathlev; Dan Obendorfer; Laura F White; Casey Rebholz; Brendan Magauran; Willie Baker; Andrew Ulrich; Linda Fisher; Jonathan Olshaker
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2012-05

6.  Resources-tasks imbalance: Experiences of nurses from factors influencing workload to increase.

Authors:  Mojgan Khademi; Easa Mohammadi; Zohreh Vanaki
Journal:  Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug

7.  Nurse Staffing Calculation in the Emergency Department - Performance-Oriented Calculation Based on the Manchester Triage System at the University Hospital Bonn.

Authors:  Ingo Gräff; Bernd Goldschmidt; Procula Glien; Sophia Klockner; Felix Erdfelder; Jennifer Lynn Schiefer; Daniel Grigutsch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.