Literature DB >> 16307945

Is incisional biopsy of melanoma harmful?

Robert C G Martin1, Charles R Scoggins, Merrick I Ross, Douglas S Reintgen, R Dirk Noyes, Michael J Edwards, Kelly M McMasters.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the era of sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy, there has been concern that manipulation, injection, and massage of intact primary melanomas (after incisional or shave biopsy) could lead to an artifactual increased rate of SLN micrometastases or an actual increased risk of recurrence. The aim of this study was to evaluate the difference in the incidence of SLN metastasis, locoregional recurrence (LRR), disease-free survival (DFS), distant disease-free survival (DDFS), or overall survival (OS) for patients who undergo excisional versus incisional versus shave biopsy.
METHODS: Analysis of database from a multicenter prospective randomized study from centers across the United States and Canada. Eligible patients were 18 to 71 years old, with cutaneous melanoma > or = 1.0 mm Breslow thickness. All patients underwent SLN biopsy using blue dye and radioactive colloid injection. SLNd were evaluated by serial histological sections with S100 immunohistochemistry. Statistical analysis was performed using univariate and multivariate analyses with a significance level of P < .05; survival analysis was performed by the Kaplan-Meier method with the log-rank test.
RESULTS: A total of 2,164 patients were evaluated; 382 patients were excluded for lack of biopsy information. Positive SLNs were found in 220 of 1,130 (19.5%), 58 of 281 (20.6%), and 67 of 354 (18.9%) of patients with excisional, incisional, or shave biopsy, respectively (no significant difference). There were significant differences among the 3 biopsy types in ulceration (P = .018, chi2) and regression (P = .022, chi2); there were no differences in age, gender, Breslow thickness, Clark level, lymphovascular invasion, tumor location, or histologic subtype. Biopsy type did not significantly affect LRR, DFS, DDFS, or OS.
CONCLUSIONS: The concern that incomplete excision of primary melanomas may result in an increased incidence of SLN micrometastases, artifactual or real, is unfounded. Similarly, there is no evidence that biopsy type adversely affects locoregional or distant recurrence. Although shave biopsy is generally discouraged because it may lead to inaccurate tumor thickness measurements, it does not appear to affect overall patient outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16307945     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.08.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  14 in total

1.  United States Preventive Services Task Force Overstates Cosmetic Harms of Skin Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Joseph F Sobanko; Kimberly Shao; Rebecca L Pearl; Sancy Leachman
Journal:  J Clin Aesthet Dermatol       Date:  2018-04-01

2.  Shave biopsy is a safe and accurate method for the initial evaluation of melanoma.

Authors:  Jonathan S Zager; Steven N Hochwald; Suroosh S Marzban; Rony Francois; Kimberly M Law; Ashley H Davis; Jane L Messina; Vladimir Vincek; Christina Mitchell; Ann Church; Edward M Copeland; Vernon K Sondak; Stephen R Grobmyer
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 3.  Guidelines of the Brazilian Dermatology Society for diagnosis, treatment and follow up of primary cutaneous melanoma--Part I.

Authors:  Luiz Guilherme Martins Castro; Maria Cristina Messina; Walter Loureiro; Ricardo Silvestre Macarenco; João Pedreira Duprat Neto; Thais Helena Bello Di Giacomo; Flávia Vasques Bittencourt; Renato Marchiori Bakos; Sérgio Schrader Serpa; Hamilton Ometto Stolf; Gabriel Gontijo
Journal:  An Bras Dermatol       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.896

4.  Non-radical diagnostic biopsies do not negatively influence melanoma patient survival.

Authors:  Barbara G Molenkamp; Berbel J R Sluijter; Benny Oosterhof; Sybren Meijer; Paul A M van Leeuwen
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-01-17       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 5.  Controversies in the diagnosis and treatment of early cutaneous melanoma.

Authors:  O A Orzan; A Șandru; C R Jecan
Journal:  J Med Life       Date:  2015 Apr-Jun

Review 6.  Options on fibroid morcellation: a literature review.

Authors:  Hans Brölmann; Vasilios Tanos; Grigoris Grimbizis; Thomas Ind; Kevin Philips; Thierry van den Bosch; Samir Sawalhe; Lukas van den Haak; Frank-Willem Jansen; Johanna Pijnenborg; Florin-Andrei Taran; Sara Brucker; Arnaud Wattiez; Rudi Campo; Peter O'Donovan; Rudy Leon de Wilde
Journal:  Gynecol Surg       Date:  2015-02-07

7.  Management of malignant melanoma.

Authors:  Goo-Hyun Mun
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2012-09-12

8.  Primary amelanotic malignant melanoma of the small intestine diagnosed by esophagogastroduodenoscopy before surgical resection.

Authors:  Takanori Suganuma; Junko Fujisaki; Toshiaki Hirasawa; Akiyosi Ishiyama; Yorimasa Yamamoto; Tomohiro Tsuchida; Masahiro Igarashi
Journal:  Clin J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-04-13

9.  Accuracy of diagnostic biopsy for cutaneous melanoma: implications for surgical oncologists.

Authors:  Tina J Hieken; Roberto Hernández-Irizarry; Julia M Boll; Jamie E Jones Coleman
Journal:  Int J Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-09-11

10.  Surgery of primary melanomas.

Authors:  Piotr Rutkowski; Marcin Zdzienicki; Zbigniew I Nowecki; Alexander C J Van Akkooi
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.