PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to identify clinical, ultrasonographic, and fluorescein angiographic features of extramacular disciform lesions that allow differentiation from uveal tumors. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 19 patients referred to our ocular oncology unit with a possible malignancy who had a diagnosis of an extramacular disciform lesion made after complete evaluation. RESULTS: The level of accuracy for each diagnostic technique alone was as follows: clinical (79%), ultrasonography (83%), and angiography (83%). Fluorescein angiography had limited utility because of severe media opacities in seven cases. No tumor developed an intraocular malignancy during the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: A combination of the above, noninvasive techniques can be used to correctly diagnose extramacular disciform lesions.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to identify clinical, ultrasonographic, and fluorescein angiographic features of extramacular disciform lesions that allow differentiation from uveal tumors. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 19 patients referred to our ocular oncology unit with a possible malignancy who had a diagnosis of an extramacular disciform lesion made after complete evaluation. RESULTS: The level of accuracy for each diagnostic technique alone was as follows: clinical (79%), ultrasonography (83%), and angiography (83%). Fluorescein angiography had limited utility because of severe media opacities in seven cases. No tumor developed an intraocular malignancy during the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: A combination of the above, noninvasive techniques can be used to correctly diagnose extramacular disciform lesions.
Authors: H Heimann; N Bornfeld; O Vij; S E Coupland; N E Bechrakis; U Kellner; M H Foerster Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 2000-10 Impact factor: 4.638