Literature DB >> 16307717

Comparative modeling and analysis of microfluidic and conventional DNA microarrays.

James A Benn1, Jenny Hu, Bradley J Hogan, Rebecca C Fry, Leona D Samson, Todd Thorsen.   

Abstract

A theoretical analysis was developed to predict molecular hybridization rates for microarrays where samples flow through microfluidic channels and for conventional microarrays where samples remain stationary during hybridization. The theory was validated by using a multiplexed microfluidic microarray where eight samples were hybridized simultaneously against eight probes using 60-mer DNA strands. Mass transfer coefficients ranged over three orders of magnitude where either kinetic reaction rates or molecular diffusion rates controlled overall hybridization rates. Probes were printed using microfluidic channels and also conventional spotting techniques. Consistent with the theoretical model, the microfluidic microarray demonstrated the ability to print DNA probes in less than 1 min and to detect 10-pM target concentrations with hybridization times in less than 5 min.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16307717     DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2005.10.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Biochem        ISSN: 0003-2697            Impact factor:   3.365


  5 in total

1.  Gold nanoparticle-assisted single base-pair mismatch discrimination on a microfluidic microarray device.

Authors:  Lin Wang; Paul C H Li
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 2.800

2.  Chemistries for patterning robust DNA microbarcodes enable multiplex assays of cytoplasm proteins from single cancer cells.

Authors:  Young Shik Shin; Habib Ahmad; Qihui Shi; Hyungjun Kim; Tod A Pascal; Rong Fan; William A Goddard; James R Heath
Journal:  Chemphyschem       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 3.102

3.  Competitive immunoassays for simultaneous detection of metabolites and proteins using micromosaic patterning.

Authors:  Brian M Murphy; Xinya He; David Dandy; Charles S Henry
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2007-12-20       Impact factor: 6.986

4.  Integrated Microfluidic Lectin Barcode Platform for High-Performance Focused Glycomic Profiling.

Authors:  Yuqin Shang; Yun Zeng; Yong Zeng
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Automated analytical microarrays: a critical review.

Authors:  Michael Seidel; Reinhard Niessner
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2008-05-27       Impact factor: 4.142

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.