| Literature DB >> 16307684 |
Monica Iskandar1, Eleonora Swist, Keith D Trick, Bingtuan Wang, Mary R L'Abbé, Jesse Bertinato.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Small increases in zinc (Zn) consumption above recommended amounts have been shown to reduce copper (Cu) status in experimental animals and humans. Recently, we have reported that copper chaperone for Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase (CCS) protein level is increased in tissues of overtly Cu-deficient rats and proposed CCS as a novel biomarker of Cu status.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2005 PMID: 16307684 PMCID: PMC1315358 DOI: 10.1186/1475-2891-4-35
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutr J ISSN: 1475-2891 Impact factor: 3.271
Total food consumption, body weight and Zn content in tissues of rats fed diets differing in Zn and Cu1,2
| Diet Group | Test Diets | Total Food | Body Weight | Liver Zn | Kidney Zn | Mucosal Zn | |
| Zn | Cu | ||||||
| Zn-30 | 41.27 ± 0.52a | 5.70 ± 0.04a | 881.0 ± 20.8a | 345.1 ± 6.2a | 91.99 ± 1.99a | 104.82 ± 1.80a | 97.12 ± 2.14a |
| Zn-60 | 65.09 ± 3.42b | 5.57 ± 0.14a | 876.9 ± 28.6a | 346.3 ± 7.3a | 94.08 ± 1.20a | 102.42 ± 1.36a | 98.94 ± 1.31a |
| Zn-120 | 129.18 ± 0.71c | 5.77 ± 0.08a | 852.8 ± 26.6a | 343.4 ± 6.4a | 104.40 ± 1.91b | 105.95 ± 1.05a | 115.28 ± 2.80b |
| Zn-240 | 242.22 ± 0.80d | 5.78 ± 0.03a | 908.6 ± 28.7a | 364.9 ± 9.0b | 109.33 ± 2.25b | 112.97 ± 2.19b | 146.04 ± 6.77c |
| Cu-D | 48.48 ± 2.54e | 1.07 ± 0.02b | 891.2 ± 28.3a | 339.0 ± 8.5a | 94.69 ± 1.53a | 102.07 ± 0.77a | 94.93 ± 1.38a |
1 Values in a column without a common letter differ, P < 0.05.
2 Values are means ± SEM, n = 12/diet group.
Tissue Cu concentrations and SOD1 activity 1,2
| Diet Group | Liver Cu | Kidney Cu | Mucosal Cu | Liver SOD1 Activity | Erythrocyte SOD1 Activity |
| Zn-30 | 17.50 ± 0.87a | 23.08 ± 1.07a | 9.66 ± 0.25ab | 27.39 ± 1.90a | 53.21 ± 2.21a |
| Zn-60 | 16.08 ± 0.57ab | 21.28 ± 1.04ab | 9.21 ± 0.26ab | 26.91 ± 1.15a | 52.61 ± 1.97a |
| Zn-120 | 14.70 ± 1.07b | 20.57 ± 0.85b | 8.64 ± 0.51a | 24.31 ± 1.84a | 48.58 ± 1.45a |
| Zn-240 | 16.38 ± 0.65ab | 21.74 ± 0.82ab | 9.78 ± 0.36b | 25.25 ± 1.44a | 49.06 ± 1.61a |
| Cu-D | 9.45 ± 0.82c | 15.84 ± 0.32c | 5.50 ± 0.49c | 19.40 ± 1.76b | 41.81 ± 1.55b |
1 Values in a column without a common letter differ, P < 0.05.
2 Values are means ± SEM, n = 12/diet group.
Figure 1Scatter plots of (A) plasma Cu concentration and (B) Cp activity of rats fed diets differing in Zn and Cu. Each solid circle corresponds to one rat (n = 12/diet group). The horizontal line across all diet groups represents the non-response mean of Zn-30 rats and that of the non-responders from other diet groups (see Methods). The dashed line within each diet group signifies the response mean for that diet group. The non-response mean (diet group Zn-30) and the response means (diet groups Zn-60, Zn-120, Zn-240 and Cu-D) were compared. Diet groups without a common letter differ (P < 0.05).
Effect of dietary Zn and Cu on plasma Cu concentration and Cp activity of rats
| Animals | Plasma Cu Concentration1,2 | Cp Activity3,4 | ||||||||
| Zn-30 | Zn-60 | Zn-120 | Zn-240 | Cu-D | Zn-30 | Zn-60 | Zn-120 | Zn-240 | Cu-D | |
| No. of non-responders | 12 | 10 | 5 | 9 | 0 | 11 | 10 | 5 | 9 | 0 |
| No. of responders5 | 0a | 2ab | 7b | 3ab | 12c | 1a | 2ab | 7b | 3ab | 12c |
| Total | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 |
1 Non-responders had a range of 667.6 – 1291.6 μg/L.
2 Responders (range <0.1 – 572.4 μg/L) were those animals having plasma Cu concentration lower than 2SD below the mean plasma copper concentration of animals in the Zn-30 diet group (Zn-30; mean ± SD = 975.0 ± 159.4 μg/L).
3 Non-responders had a range of 65.3 – 152.8 U/L.
4 Responders (range <0.1 – 57.8 U/L) were those animals having Cp activity lower than 2SD below the mean Cp activity of animals in the Zn-30 diet group (Zn-30; mean ± SD = 106.5 ± 23.9).
5 No. of responders were compared using the Fisher exact test. For each diet group, No. of responders without a common letter differ, P < 0.05.
Figure 2(A) Liver, (B) erythrocyte and (C) WBC CCS content of rats fed diets differing in Zn and Cu. CCS expression in liver is expressed relative to that of β-Actin. CCS expression in erythrocytes and WBCs is expressed relative to that of GAPDH. Bars signify the mean ± SEM, n = 12 (for liver and erythrocytes) or 7 (for WBCs)/diet group. Diet groups without a common letter differ (P < 0.05).
Comparison of tissue CCS expression between Zn-30 rats and responders and non-responders for plasma Cu1,2
| Animals | CCS Expression | ||
| Liver | Erythrocyte | WBC | |
| Zn-30 | 1.00 ± 0.14a | 1.00 ± 0.18a | 1.00 ± 0.20a |
| Non-responders3 | 1.18 ± 0.11a | 1.44 ± 0.16ab | 0.95 ± 0.11a |
| Responders4 | 1.97 ± 0.12b | 1.86 ± 0.20b | 2.02 ± 0.54b |
1 Values in a column without a common letter differ, P < 0.05. Values are means ± SEM.
2 n values are in parentheses.
3 Rats from diet groups Zn-60, Zn-120 and Zn-240 characterised as non-responders for plasma Cu.
4 Rats from diet groups Zn-60, Zn-120 and Zn-240 characterised as responders for plasma Cu.
Correlation between CCS content in tissues and liver and plasma Cu concentration, Cp activity and liver and erythrocyte SOD1 activity1,2
| Tissue CCS | Diet Groups3, n = 60 | Diet Groups4, n = 48 | ||||||||
| Liver Cu | Plasma Cu | Cp | Liver SOD1 | Erythrocyte SOD1 | Liver Cu | Plasma Cu | Cp | Liver SOD1 | Erythrocyte SOD1 | |
| Liver | -0.746 | -0.816 | -0.787 | -0.418 | -0.464 | -0.597 | -0.649 | -0.615 | -0.222 | -0.221 |
| Erythrocyte | -0.633 | -0.618 | -0.590 | -0.268 | -0.332 | -0.425 | -0.308 | -0.297 | -0.001 | 0.001 |
| WBC | -0.7685 | -0.8135 | -0.7695 | -0.4955 | -0.5825 | -0.4746 | -0.5596 | -0.5436 | -0.0696 | -0.4296 |
1 Pearson's correlation coefficients.
2 P values are in parentheses; NSD = no statistical difference.
3 Diet groups Zn-30, Zn-60, Zn-120, Zn-240, and Cu-D.
4 Diet groups Zn-30, Zn-60, Zn-120, and Zn-240.
5 n = 35.
6 n = 28.
Figure 3QPCR analysis of duodenal mRNA expression of Zn-trafficking proteins in rats fed diets differing in Zn and Cu. MT-1, ZnT-1, ZnT-2, ZnT-4 and Zip4 mRNA content is expressed relative to β-Actin expression. Bars represent the mean ± SEM, n = 4/diet group. For each gene, diet groups without a common letter differ (P < 0.05).