Literature DB >> 16307206

A dynamical systems analysis of the indirect response model with special emphasis on time to peak response.

Lambertus A Peletier1, Johan Gabrielsson, Jacintha den Haag.   

Abstract

In this paper we present a mathematical analysis of the four classical indirect response models. We focus on characteristics such as the evolution of the response R(t) with time t, the time of maximal/minimal response T(max) and the area between the response and the baseline AUC(R), and the way these quantities depend on the drug dose, the dynamic parameters such as E(max) and EC50 and the ratio of the fractional turnover rate k(out) to the elimination rate constant k of drug in plasma. We find that depending on the model and on the drug mechanism function, T(max) may increase, decrease, decrease and then increase, or stay the same, as the drug dose is increased. This has important implications for using the shift in T(max) as a diagnostic tool in the selection of an appropriate model.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16307206     DOI: 10.1007/s10928-005-0047-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn        ISSN: 1567-567X            Impact factor:   2.745


  16 in total

1.  Asymptotics of the total net direct pharmacological effect for large drug doses.

Authors:  W Krzyzanski
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.259

2.  Mathematical formalism and characteristics of four basic models of indirect pharmacodynamic responses for drug infusions.

Authors:  W Krzyzanski; W J Jusko
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1998-08

3.  Characterization of the dose-dependent time of peak effect in indirect response models.

Authors:  A Majumdar
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1998-04

4.  Pharmacodynamic modeling of furosemide tolerance after multiple intravenous administration.

Authors:  M Wakelkamp; G Alván; J Gabrielsson; G Paintaud
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 6.875

5.  Integrated functions for four basic models of indirect pharmacodynamic response.

Authors:  W Krzyzanski; W J Jusko
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.534

6.  Characterization of four basic models of indirect pharmacodynamic responses.

Authors:  A Sharma; W J Jusko
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1996-12

7.  Comparison of four basic models of indirect pharmacodynamic responses.

Authors:  N L Dayneka; V Garg; W J Jusko
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1993-08

8.  A turnover model of irreversible inhibition of gastric acid secretion by omeprazole in the dog.

Authors:  A Abelö; U G Eriksson; M O Karlsson; H Larsson; J Gabrielsson
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.030

9.  Dose-dependence and repeated-dose studies for receptor/gene-mediated pharmacodynamics of methylprednisolone on glucocorticoid receptor down-regulation and tyrosine aminotransferase induction in rat liver.

Authors:  Y N Sun; D C DuBois; R R Almon; N A Pyszczynski; W J Jusko
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1998-12

10.  A model eliciting transient responses.

Authors:  E B Ekblad; V Licko
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1984-01
View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Pattern Recognition in Pharmacodynamic Data Analysis.

Authors:  Johan Gabrielsson; Stephan Hjorth
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 4.009

2.  Mathematical assessment of properties of precursor-dependent indirect pharmacodynamic response models.

Authors:  Anasuya Hazra; Wojciech Krzyzanski; William J Jusko
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2006-10-12       Impact factor: 2.745

Review 3.  A flexible nonlinear feedback system that captures diverse patterns of adaptation and rebound.

Authors:  Johan Gabrielsson; Lambertus A Peletier
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2008-02-22       Impact factor: 4.009

4.  Atazanavir-bilirubin interaction: a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model.

Authors:  Roberto Lozano; Nieves Domeque; Alberto-Fermin Apesteguia
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-09-27

5.  Modelling the delay between pharmacokinetics and EEG effects of morphine in rats: binding kinetic versus effect compartment models.

Authors:  Wilhelmus E A de Witte; Vivi Rottschäfer; Meindert Danhof; Piet H van der Graaf; Lambertus A Peletier; Elizabeth C M de Lange
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2018-05-18       Impact factor: 2.745

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.