OBJECTIVE: To validate a method for assessing fruit and vegetable intake among adults in a population of low intake. The method assesses mean intake and ranks individuals by their usual intake. DESIGN: A precoded fruit and vegetable Questionnaire included a 24-h recall and a food frequency. The participants filled in the Questionnaire, a week later they started a 7-day food record, 1-day weighed record and 6 days using household measures. SUBJECTS: Following advertisements 40 participants were recruited, 36 returned food records(mean age=37 years). RESULTS: No difference was observed between the average intake yielded by the 24-h recall and that from the 1-day weighed food record of fruits or vegetables. Correlation coefficients between results from the food frequency questionnaire and the 7-day food records were 0.45 (P=0.007) for vegetables, 0.63 (P<0.001) for fruits and 0.73 (P<0.001) for fruits and vegetables combined. Cross-classification into quartiles showed that the proportion of participants in the same or the adjacent quartile of the intake distribution were 94% for fruit intake and 80% for vegetable intake. Registered intake of fruits and vegetables was higher the first 4 days of the record than the last 3 days (P=0.002). The 4-day food record correlated with the food frequency questionnaire in similar manner as the 7-day record. CONCLUSION: The present study indicates that the precoded 24-h recall may be valuable tool for measuring average intake of fruits and vegetables among adults in a population of low intake. Moreover, the food frequency questionnaire was valid for ranking individuals according to their usual intake. A 4-day food record might be sufficient when validating food frequency questionnaires for fruits and vegetables.
OBJECTIVE: To validate a method for assessing fruit and vegetable intake among adults in a population of low intake. The method assesses mean intake and ranks individuals by their usual intake. DESIGN: A precoded fruit and vegetable Questionnaire included a 24-h recall and a food frequency. The participants filled in the Questionnaire, a week later they started a 7-day food record, 1-day weighed record and 6 days using household measures. SUBJECTS: Following advertisements 40 participants were recruited, 36 returned food records(mean age=37 years). RESULTS: No difference was observed between the average intake yielded by the 24-h recall and that from the 1-day weighed food record of fruits or vegetables. Correlation coefficients between results from the food frequency questionnaire and the 7-day food records were 0.45 (P=0.007) for vegetables, 0.63 (P<0.001) for fruits and 0.73 (P<0.001) for fruits and vegetables combined. Cross-classification into quartiles showed that the proportion of participants in the same or the adjacent quartile of the intake distribution were 94% for fruit intake and 80% for vegetable intake. Registered intake of fruits and vegetables was higher the first 4 days of the record than the last 3 days (P=0.002). The 4-day food record correlated with the food frequency questionnaire in similar manner as the 7-day record. CONCLUSION: The present study indicates that the precoded 24-h recall may be valuable tool for measuring average intake of fruits and vegetables among adults in a population of low intake. Moreover, the food frequency questionnaire was valid for ranking individuals according to their usual intake. A 4-day food record might be sufficient when validating food frequency questionnaires for fruits and vegetables.
Authors: Christina Pollard; Margaret Miller; Richard John Woodman; Rosie Meng; Colin Binns Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2008-12-04 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: T Eysteinsdottir; I Gunnarsdottir; I Thorsdottir; T Harris; L J Launer; V Gudnason; L Steingrimsdottir Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2011-12 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: Monica H Carlsen; Inger T L Lillegaard; Anette Karlsen; Rune Blomhoff; Christian A Drevon; Lene F Andersen Journal: Nutr J Date: 2010-09-15 Impact factor: 3.271
Authors: Cheryl-Ann Bennett; Andrea M de Silva-Sanigorski; Melanie Nichols; Andrew C Bell; Boyd A Swinburn Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2009-10-26 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: Saskia J Te Velde; Marianne Wind; Carmen Perez-Rodrigo; Knut-Inge Klepp; Johannes Brug Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2008-10-15 Impact factor: 6.457