Literature DB >> 16306858

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study about the effects of cannabidiol (CBD) on the pharmacokinetics of Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) after oral application of THC verses standardized cannabis extract.

Thomas Nadulski1, Fritz Pragst, Gordon Weinberg, Patrik Roser, Martin Schnelle, Eva-Maria Fronk, Andreas Michael Stadelmann.   

Abstract

Cannabidiol (CBD) is known to modify the effects of Delta-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) by decreasing anxiety and antagonizing other THC-effects. As a reason, pharmacodynamic as well as pharmacokinetic mechanisms were suggested. In context of the use of cannabis-based medicine extracts for therapeutic purposes, a study was performed in a double-blind and placebo-controlled cross-over design in which each of 24 volunteers (12 male and 12 female, age 18-45 years) obtained soft-gelatin capsules with 10 mg THC (THC-set), cannabis extract containing 10 mg THC +5.4 mg CBD (CAN-set) or placebo in weekly intervals. Blood samples were taken 30 minutes before and 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, 3 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours, 9 hours and 24 hours after the intake. The concentrations of THC, of its metabolites 11-OH-THC, THC-COOH and of CBD in the plasma samples were determined by automatic solid phase extraction, derivatization with N,O-bis(trimethylsilyl)triflouroacetamide and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. The concentration versus time curves (maximum concentrations Cmax, corresponding time tmax and areas under the curves AUC) were evaluated by statistical methods with respect to equivalence or differences between the CAN-set and the THC-set. Furthermore, the intra-individual ratios of Cmax and AUC for 11-OH-THC/THC, THC-COOH/THC and THC-COOH/11-OH-THC were compared between the THC-set and the CAN-set. Despite the large variation of the data, evidence emerged from the total of the results that CBD partially inhibits the CYP 2C catalyzed hydroxylation of THC to 11-OH-THC. The probability for this inhibition is particularly high for oral intake because THC and CBD attain relatively high concentrations in the liver and because of the high first-pass metabolism of THC. However, the effect of CBD is small in comparison to the variability caused by other factors. Therefore, a pharmacokinetic reason for the differences determined between pure THC and cannabis extract is improbable at the doses chosen in this study. Significantly higher AUC and Cmax and shorter tmax were found for females as compared with males.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16306858     DOI: 10.1097/01.ftd.0000177223.19294.5c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ther Drug Monit        ISSN: 0163-4356            Impact factor:   3.681


  52 in total

1.  THC and CBD blood and brain concentrations following daily administration to adolescent primates.

Authors:  S L Withey; J Bergman; M A Huestis; S R George; B K Madras
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 4.492

2.  Fatty acid-binding proteins (FABPs) are intracellular carriers for Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD).

Authors:  Matthew W Elmes; Martin Kaczocha; William T Berger; KwanNok Leung; Brian P Ralph; Liqun Wang; Joseph M Sweeney; Jeremy T Miyauchi; Stella E Tsirka; Iwao Ojima; Dale G Deutsch
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 3.  Human cannabinoid pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  Marilyn A Huestis
Journal:  Chem Biodivers       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.408

4.  Human Pharmacokinetic Parameters of Orally Administered Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol Capsules Are Altered by Fed Versus Fasted Conditions and Sex Differences.

Authors:  Stephanie Lunn; Patrick Diaz; Shannon O'Hearn; Shaina P Cahill; Alexia Blake; Kelly Narine; Jason R B Dyck
Journal:  Cannabis Cannabinoid Res       Date:  2019-12-06

Review 5.  Pharmacokinetic Drug Interactions with Tobacco, Cannabinoids and Smoking Cessation Products.

Authors:  Gail D Anderson; Lingtak-Neander Chan
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 6.447

6.  Cannabidiol-Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol interactions on acute pain and locomotor activity.

Authors:  Stevie C Britch; Jenny L Wiley; Zhihao Yu; Brian H Clowers; Rebecca M Craft
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2017-04-15       Impact factor: 4.492

7.  Cannabidiol modulation of antinociceptive tolerance to Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol.

Authors:  Nicholas Z Greene; Jenny L Wiley; Zhihao Yu; Brian H Clowers; Rebecca M Craft
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Acute and chronic effects of cannabidiol on Δ⁹-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ⁹-THC)-induced disruption in stop signal task performance.

Authors:  David S Jacobs; Stephen J Kohut; Shan Jiang; Spyros P Nikas; Alexandros Makriyannis; Jack Bergman
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 3.157

9.  Simultaneous GC-EI-MS determination of Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol, 11-hydroxy-Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol, and 11-nor-9-carboxy-Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol in human urine following tandem enzyme-alkaline hydrolysis.

Authors:  Tsadik T Abraham; Ross H Lowe; Stephane O Pirnay; William D Darwin; Marilyn A Huestis
Journal:  J Anal Toxicol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.367

10.  A placebo-controlled trial of buspirone for the treatment of marijuana dependence.

Authors:  Aimee L McRae-Clark; Rickey E Carter; Therese K Killeen; Matthew J Carpenter; Amy E Wahlquist; Stacey A Simpson; Kathleen T Brady
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2009-08-21       Impact factor: 4.492

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.