Literature DB >> 16306418

Separate face and body selectivity on the fusiform gyrus.

Rebecca F Schwarzlose1, Chris I Baker, Nancy Kanwisher.   

Abstract

Recent reports of a high response to bodies in the fusiform face area (FFA) challenge the idea that the FFA is exclusively selective for face stimuli. We examined this claim by conducting a functional magnetic resonance imaging experiment at both standard (3.125 x 3.125 x 4.0 mm) and high resolution (1.4 x 1.4 x 2.0 mm). In both experiments, regions of interest (ROIs) were defined using data from blocked localizer runs. Within each ROI, we measured the mean peak response to a variety of stimulus types in independent data from a subsequent event-related experiment. Our localizer scans identified a fusiform body area (FBA), a body-selective region reported recently by Peelen and Downing (2005) that is anatomically distinct from the extrastriate body area. The FBA overlapped with and was adjacent to the FFA in all but two participants. Selectivity of the FFA to faces and FBA to bodies was stronger for the high-resolution scans, as expected from the reduction in partial volume effects. When new ROIs were constructed for the high-resolution experiment by omitting the voxels showing overlapping selectivity for both bodies and faces in the localizer scans, the resulting FFA* ROI showed no response above control objects for body stimuli, and the FBA* ROI showed no response above control objects for face stimuli. These results demonstrate strong selectivities in distinct but adjacent regions in the fusiform gyrus for only faces in one region (the FFA*) and only bodies in the other (the FBA*).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16306418      PMCID: PMC6725864          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2621-05.2005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  142 in total

1.  Sparsely-distributed organization of face and limb activations in human ventral temporal cortex.

Authors:  Kevin S Weiner; Kalanit Grill-Spector
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Mapping brain activation and information during category-specific visual working memory.

Authors:  David E J Linden; Nikolaas N Oosterhof; Christoph Klein; Paul E Downing
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Probing principles of large-scale object representation: category preference and location encoding.

Authors:  Radoslaw Martin Cichy; Philipp Sterzer; Jakob Heinzle; Lloyd T Elliott; Fernando Ramirez; John-Dylan Haynes
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  fMRI-adaptation and category selectivity in human ventral temporal cortex: regional differences across time scales.

Authors:  Kevin S Weiner; Rory Sayres; Joakim Vinberg; Kalanit Grill-Spector
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  High-level visual object representations are constrained by position.

Authors:  Dwight J Kravitz; Nikolaus Kriegeskorte; Chris I Baker
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 6.  Brain control and information transfer.

Authors:  Edward J Tehovnik; Lewis L Chen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-08-30       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Temporal Processing Capacity in High-Level Visual Cortex Is Domain Specific.

Authors:  Anthony Stigliani; Kevin S Weiner; Kalanit Grill-Spector
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 8.  The fusiform face area: a cortical region specialized for the perception of faces.

Authors:  Nancy Kanwisher; Galit Yovel
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-12-29       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  A continuous semantic space describes the representation of thousands of object and action categories across the human brain.

Authors:  Alexander G Huth; Shinji Nishimoto; An T Vu; Jack L Gallant
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Attentional and perceptual factors affecting the attentional blink for faces and objects.

Authors:  Ayelet N Landau; Shlomo Bentin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.