Literature DB >> 1630618

Diffusion of contrast media in cerebrospinal fluid: comparison of iohexol, iopamidol and iotrolan in vitro.

R Raininko1, H Teräväinen.   

Abstract

Diffusion of iohexol (300 and 240 mgI/ml), iopamidol (300 and 200 mgI/ml), and iotrolan (300 and 240 mgI/ml) in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of 16 patients was studied in vitro. Test tubes containing CSF were kept in a waterbath at 37 degrees C. Contrast medium was injected along the wall into the tubes, and diffusion of contrast media in the tubes was followed with repeated computed tomography for 5 h. The contents of the tubes were then mixed by shaking, and the tubes were scanned immediately and 8 h later. The contrast media first settled in the bottom of the tubes and then diffused upwards. Iotrolan diffused more slowly than the other media, but the difference was only significant at a concentration of 300 mgI/ml. The difference between iohexol and iopamidol was minimal. In general, diffusion was slower in CSF samples with an elevated protein content, but the difference in the diffusion of contrast medium in normal and pathological CSF was seldom statistically significant, perhaps owing to the small number of samples (5) with an elevated protein content. All contrast medium-CSF mixtures remained homogeneous after mixing. These experiments showed measurable differences in the diffusion of contrast media in CSF, but it does not seem very likely that these would be significant in clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1630618     DOI: 10.1007/bf00596344

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroradiology        ISSN: 0028-3940            Impact factor:   2.804


  6 in total

1.  Normal flow patterns of intracranial and spinal cerebrospinal fluid defined with phase-contrast cine MR imaging.

Authors:  D R Enzmann; N J Pelc
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Iotrolan versus iopamidol for cervical myelography: a randomized double-blind trial.

Authors:  C Coutinho; A McGeorge; P Macpherson; E Teasdale
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Cerebrospinal fluid pulsations at myelography: a videodensitometric study.

Authors:  B Lane; I I Kricheff
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1974-03       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Pulsatile movements in the CSF pathways.

Authors:  G H Du Boulay
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1966-04       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  A prospective comparison of iotrolan, iohexol and iopamidol for lumbar myelography.

Authors:  J Lamb; V McAllister; M Nelson; R Bartlett; I Smith; C E Deopugari
Journal:  Acta Radiol Suppl       Date:  1986

6.  Iotrolan versus iopamidol: a controlled, multicenter, double-blind study of lumbar and direct cervical myelography.

Authors:  K Ringel; E Klotz; B I Wenzel-Hora
Journal:  Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd       Date:  1989
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.