Literature DB >> 16305562

The development and process evaluation of an information-based intervention for pregnant women aimed at addressing rates of caesarean section.

Ruth Walker1, Deborah Turnbull, Nicole Pratt, Chris Wilkinson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Few strategies aimed at addressing rising rates of caesarean section have explicitly involved information-based approaches for pregnant women. This study describes the development and evaluation of such an intervention for pregnant women, encompassing pamphlets and a peer support network (PSN).
DESIGN: Process evaluation.
SETTING: The study was undertaken at a metropolitan teaching hospital in Adelaide, South Australia. POPULATION: A consecutive sample of pregnant women attending the ultrasound clinic over a two-month period, recruited at 18 weeks of gestation.
METHODS: Participants received two pamphlets at 18 weeks of gestation and information on a PSN at around 28 weeks of gestation. A questionnaire was sent to women at seven weeks postnatal, asking them to evaluate the intervention. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The extent to which the intervention resources were used and participants were satisfied with the resources they received.
RESULTS: Ninety-two women returned questionnaires (response rate of 62%). Women generally resisted engaging with the informational resources, citing irrelevance to their situation, for example, 53% (49/92) read all of the pamphlets. None of the women used the PSN. Women who had experienced childbirth previously and those of higher education were significantly more likely to read the pamphlets. While generally satisfied with pamphlet content, one in five women reported feeling distressed by some of the information.
CONCLUSIONS: This exploratory study casts doubt on the notion of information provision for pregnant women as a panacea for addressing rising rates of caesarean section.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16305562     DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00753.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJOG        ISSN: 1470-0328            Impact factor:   6.531


  2 in total

1.  Decision-making about mode of delivery after previous caesarean section: development and piloting of two computer-based decision aids.

Authors:  Clare L Emmett; Deirdre J Murphy; Roshni R Patel; Tom Fahey; Claire Jones; Ian W Ricketts; Peter Gregor; Maureen Macleod; Alan A Montgomery
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Fear, Risk, and the Responsible Choice: Risk Narratives and Lowering the Rate of Caesarean Sections in High-income Countries.

Authors:  Helga Hallgrimsdottir; Leah Shumka; Catherine Althaus; Cecilia Benoit
Journal:  AIMS Public Health       Date:  2017-12-26
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.