Literature DB >> 16305447

Complement activation-related pseudoallergy caused by amphiphilic drug carriers: the role of lipoproteins.

Janos Szebeni1.   

Abstract

Self-assembling amphiphilic lipids or polymers have been successfully used in pharmacotherapy as drug solvents or carriers, improving the bioavailability of water-insoluble drugs. This review focuses on an unusual hypersensitivity reaction (HSR) caused by a micellar (Cremophor EL, CrEL) and a monomeric block copolymer (poloxamer 188) representative of these systems. The HSRs, also referred to as anaphylactoid or pseudoallergic, are thought to arise as a consequence of complement (C) activation in blood. However, considering that C activation involves the deposition of multiple C and other (immune) proteins on the activator surface, the mechanism by which small, 8-25 nm CrEL micelles or individual poloxamer 188 molecules activate C is not straightforward. Observations on enlarged lipoproteins and de novo formation of abnormally large lipoprotein-like structures in plasma exposed to CrEL or poloxamer 188 raise the possibility that lipoprotein transformation might play a crucial role in C activation by these amphiphilic emulsifiers. Lipoproteins, furthermore, can also provide a negative feedback control on C activation, as suggested by the inhibition of poloxamer 188-induced C activation in the presence of excess exogenous lipoproteins, and the attenuation of liposome-induced and C activation-related hypotension in pigs by precoating the vesicles with lipoproteins. Thus, lipoproteins may be essential in the induction, and they may also play a complex modulatory role in C activation-related pseudoallergy caused amphiphilic drug solvents and carriers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16305447     DOI: 10.2174/156720105774370212

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Drug Deliv        ISSN: 1567-2018            Impact factor:   2.565


  10 in total

Review 1.  Factors influencing the use and interpretation of animal models in the development of parenteral drug delivery systems.

Authors:  Marilyn N Martinez
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 2.  Immunological risk of injectable drug delivery systems.

Authors:  Wim Jiskoot; Rianne M F van Schie; Myrra G Carstens; Huub Schellekens
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 4.200

3.  The role of poly(ethylene glycol) brush architecture in complement activation on targeted microbubble surfaces.

Authors:  Cherry C Chen; Mark A Borden
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 4.  To PEGylate or not to PEGylate: Immunological properties of nanomedicine's most popular component, polyethylene glycol and its alternatives.

Authors:  Da Shi; Damian Beasock; Adam Fessler; Janos Szebeni; Julia Y Ljubimova; Kirill A Afonin; Marina A Dobrovolskaia
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 15.470

5.  Mediation of a non-proteolytic activation of complement component C3 by phospholipid vesicles.

Authors:  Yvonne Klapper; Osama A Hamad; Yuji Teramura; Gero Leneweit; G Ulrich Nienhaus; Daniel Ricklin; John D Lambris; Kristina N Ekdahl; Bo Nilsson
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 12.479

6.  Subvisible Particles in IVIg Formulations Activate Complement in Human Serum.

Authors:  Carly F Chisholm; William Behnke; Yekaterina Pokhilchuk; Ashley A Frazer-Abel; Theodore W Randolph
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 3.534

Review 7.  Impact of nanotechnology in cancer: emphasis on nanochemoprevention.

Authors:  Imtiaz A Siddiqui; Vaqar M Adhami; Jean Christopher Chamcheu; Hasan Mukhtar
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2012-02-02

8.  Suspected anaphylactic reaction associated with microemulsion propofol during anesthesia induction.

Authors:  Se Jin Lee; Soon Im Kim; Bo Il Jung; Su Myung Lee; Mun Gyu Kim; Sun Young Park; Sang Ho Kim; Si Young Ok
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 2.153

9.  Suspected anaphylactic reaction associated with microemulsion propofol during anesthesia induction.

Authors:  Se Jin Lee
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 10.  Comparative Safety of Vaccine Adjuvants: A Summary of Current Evidence and Future Needs.

Authors:  Nikolai Petrovsky
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 5.606

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.