BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This cross-sectional study evaluated the relative contributions of psychosocial and mechanical variables to physical performance measures in people with knee osteoarthritis (OA). SUBJECTS: Fifty-four subjects (age, in years: mean=68.3, SD=8.7, range=50-87) with radiographically confirmed knee OA were included in this study. METHODS: Physical performance measures included the Six-Minute Walk Test (SMW), the Timed "Up & Go" Test (TUG), and a stair-climbing task (STR). Responses to psychosocial questionnaires that reflect depression, anxiety, and self-efficacy (a person's confidence in his or her ability to complete a task) were collected. Mechanical variables measured included body mass index and knee strength (force-generating capacity of muscle). Stepwise linear regressions were performed with the SMW, TUG, and STR as separate dependent variables. RESULTS: Functional self-efficacy explained the greatest amount of variance in all performance measures, contributing 45% or more. Knee strength and body weight also explained some variance in performance measures. Anxiety and depression did not explain any variance in performance. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Physical therapists evaluating the significance of the SMW, TUG, and STR scores in subjects with knee OA should note that a large part of each score reflects self-efficacy, or confidence, for physical tasks, with some contributions from knee strength and body weight.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This cross-sectional study evaluated the relative contributions of psychosocial and mechanical variables to physical performance measures in people with knee osteoarthritis (OA). SUBJECTS: Fifty-four subjects (age, in years: mean=68.3, SD=8.7, range=50-87) with radiographically confirmed knee OA were included in this study. METHODS: Physical performance measures included the Six-Minute Walk Test (SMW), the Timed "Up & Go" Test (TUG), and a stair-climbing task (STR). Responses to psychosocial questionnaires that reflect depression, anxiety, and self-efficacy (a person's confidence in his or her ability to complete a task) were collected. Mechanical variables measured included body mass index and knee strength (force-generating capacity of muscle). Stepwise linear regressions were performed with the SMW, TUG, and STR as separate dependent variables. RESULTS: Functional self-efficacy explained the greatest amount of variance in all performance measures, contributing 45% or more. Knee strength and body weight also explained some variance in performance measures. Anxiety and depression did not explain any variance in performance. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Physical therapists evaluating the significance of the SMW, TUG, and STR scores in subjects with knee OA should note that a large part of each score reflects self-efficacy, or confidence, for physical tasks, with some contributions from knee strength and body weight.
Authors: M D Bucknor; L Nardo; G B Joseph; H Alizai; W Srikhum; M C Nevitt; J A Lynch; C E McCulloch; T M Link Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2015-01-12 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: Jasmijn F M Holla; Diana C Sanchez-Ramirez; Marike van der Leeden; Johannes C F Ket; Leo D Roorda; Willem F Lems; Martijn P M Steultjens; Joost Dekker Journal: J Behav Med Date: 2014-05-20
Authors: Magdalena I Tolea; Paul T Costa; Antonio Terracciano; Luigi Ferrucci; Kimberly Faulkner; Mathilda Mace C Coday; Hilsa N Ayonayon; Eleanor M Simonsick Journal: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci Date: 2012-03-26 Impact factor: 4.077
Authors: Ershela L Sims; Francis J Keefe; Virginia B Kraus; Farshid Guilak; Robin M Queen; Daniel Schmitt Journal: Aging Clin Exp Res Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 3.636
Authors: Mary Beth Nebel; Ershela L Sims; Francis J Keefe; Virginia B Kraus; Farshid Guilak; David S Caldwell; Jennifer J Pells; Robin Queen; Daniel Schmitt Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Carrie A Karvonen-Gutierrez; Siobán D Harlow; Peter Mancuso; Jon Jacobson; Carlos F Mendes de Leon; Bin Nan Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2013-06 Impact factor: 4.794