| Literature DB >> 16304459 |
D Kimberley Molina1, Vincent J Dimaio.
Abstract
Urine immunoassays are commonly used as a rapid screen for drugs of abuse in emergency room, hospital, clinic, and forensic settings. The authors were concerned whether or not a negative screen of the urine for opiates was of significance and indicative that analysis of blood for opiates was not necessary. Specifically, we wished to determine whether a negative test for opiates by immunoassay absolutely rules out an acute overdose, and if not, what percentage of cases with negative results have opiates in the blood. A retrospective analysis was performed using the toxicology results for cases ruled an acute narcotic overdose at the Bexar County Medical Examiner's Office between 1998 and 2003. One hundred eighty-three cases met the criteria for the study. A false-negative rate of approximately 15% was found using an immunoassay as compared with blood analysis for narcotics. The authors feel that while this rate may be acceptable in a clinical setting, it is unacceptable in a forensic setting.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2005 PMID: 16304459 DOI: 10.1097/01.paf.0000188089.10062.f4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Forensic Med Pathol ISSN: 0195-7910 Impact factor: 0.921