Literature DB >> 16304459

The reliability of immunoassay for determining the presence of opiates in the forensic setting.

D Kimberley Molina1, Vincent J Dimaio.   

Abstract

Urine immunoassays are commonly used as a rapid screen for drugs of abuse in emergency room, hospital, clinic, and forensic settings. The authors were concerned whether or not a negative screen of the urine for opiates was of significance and indicative that analysis of blood for opiates was not necessary. Specifically, we wished to determine whether a negative test for opiates by immunoassay absolutely rules out an acute overdose, and if not, what percentage of cases with negative results have opiates in the blood. A retrospective analysis was performed using the toxicology results for cases ruled an acute narcotic overdose at the Bexar County Medical Examiner's Office between 1998 and 2003. One hundred eighty-three cases met the criteria for the study. A false-negative rate of approximately 15% was found using an immunoassay as compared with blood analysis for narcotics. The authors feel that while this rate may be acceptable in a clinical setting, it is unacceptable in a forensic setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16304459     DOI: 10.1097/01.paf.0000188089.10062.f4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Forensic Med Pathol        ISSN: 0195-7910            Impact factor:   0.921


  1 in total

1.  Fast gradient elution reversed-phase liquid chromatography with diode-array detection as a high-throughput screening method for drugs of abuse. II. Data analysis.

Authors:  Sarah E G Porter; Dwight R Stoll; Changyub Paek; Sarah C Rutan; Peter W Carr
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2006-10-27       Impact factor: 4.759

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.