Literature DB >> 16304298

Effect of modified ultrafiltration on pulmonary function after cardiopulmonary bypass.

Alaa-Basiouni S Mahmoud1, Mohamed S Burhani, Ali A Hannef, Ahmad A Jamjoom, Iskander S Al-Githmi, Ghassan M Baslaim.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary dysfunction is one of the most common manifestations of inflammatory response after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB).
OBJECTIVE: This prospective randomized study was conducted to evaluate the effect of a modified ultrafiltration (MUF) technique on pulmonary function after CPB in children.
METHODS: Forty patients weighing from 5 to 10 kg with congenital heart disease who required CPB for primary biventricular operative repair were prospectively randomized into two groups. The control group received conventional ultrafiltration (CUF) during CPB, and the study group received CUF and MUF. Pulmonary compliance (static and dynamic) and gas exchange capacity of the lung expressed as oxygen index, respiratory index, ventilation index, and alveolar-arterial oxygen pressure difference were measured after intubation (baseline), at the termination of CPB, at the end of MUF, on admission to the ICU, and 6 h postoperatively.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference in lung compliance and gas exchange between the two groups before CPB. CPB produced a significant decrease in static and dynamic lung compliance in both groups. In the control group, static and dynamic lung compliance decreased from 1.0 +/- 0.3 to 0.90 +/- 0.3 mL/cm/kg and 0.87 +/- 0.2 to 0.71 +/- 0.1 mL/cm/kg (+/- SE) [p = 0.0002 and p = 0.002, respectively]. In the study group, static and dynamic lung compliance decreased from 1.0 +/- 0.2 to 0.89 +/- 0.03 mL/cm/kg and 0.94 +/- 0.2 to 0.77 +/- 0.1 mL/cm/kg (p = 0.002 and p = 0.002, respectively). There was no significant difference in the decrease in static (p = 0.9) or dynamic lung compliance (p = 0.3) between the two groups. MUF produced a significant immediate improvement in both static lung compliance (0.89 +/- 0.2 to 0.98 +/- 0.2 mL/cm/kg, p = 0.03) and dynamic lung compliance (0.77 +/- 0.1 to 0.93 +/- 0.2 mL/cm/kg, p = 0.007). The same was observed regarding the gas exchange capacity. CPB produced a significant decrease in lung gas exchange capacity, and MUF produced a significant immediate improvement in lung gas exchange capacity. The effect of MUF on lung compliance and gas exchange capacity was not sustained after admission to the ICU nor 6 h later postoperatively. There was no significant difference in the time of extubation between the two groups (12 +/- 3 h and 13 +/- 2 h, p = 0.4), the length of ICU stay, or the total hospital stay postoperatively.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of MUF after CPB can produce an immediate improvement in lung compliance and gas exchange capacity, which may effectively minimize pulmonary dysfunction postbiventricular repair of congenital heart disease. However, these improvements are not sustained for the first 6 h postoperatively and do not reduce the duration of postoperative intubation, ICU stay, or total hospital stay.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16304298     DOI: 10.1378/chest.128.5.3447

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  12 in total

1.  Factors prolonging length of stay in the cardiac intensive care unit following the arterial switch operation.

Authors:  Derek S Wheeler; Catherine L Dent; Peter B Manning; David P Nelson
Journal:  Cardiol Young       Date:  2007-12-20       Impact factor: 1.093

Review 2.  Cardiopulmonary bypass for pediatric cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Yasutaka Hirata
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2017-11-28

3.  Assessment of pulmonary function tests in cardiac patients.

Authors:  Salwa B El-Sobkey; Magdi Gomaa
Journal:  J Saudi Heart Assoc       Date:  2011-01-07

Review 4.  Prevention of lung injury in cardiac surgery: a review.

Authors:  Robert W Young
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2014-06

Review 5.  Minimally invasive paediatric cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Emile Bacha; David Kalfa
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 6.  Modified ultrafiltration during cardiopulmonary bypass and postoperative course of pediatric cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Mohsen Ziyaeifard; Azin Alizadehasl; Gholamreza Massoumi
Journal:  Res Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2014-04-01

7.  The effect of combined conventional and modified ultrafiltration on mechanical ventilation and hemodynamic changes in congenital heart surgery.

Authors:  Mohsen Ziyaeifard; Azin Alizadehasl; Nahid Aghdaii; Poupak Rahimzadeh; Gholamreza Masoumi; Samad Ej Golzari; Mostafa Fatahi; Farhad Gorjipur
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 1.852

8.  Venoarterial modified ultrafiltration versus conventional arteriovenous modified ultrafiltration during cardiopulmonary bypass surgery.

Authors:  Rakesh Mohanlall; Jamila Adam; Arto Nemlander
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.526

Review 9.  Strategies to prevent intraoperative lung injury during cardiopulmonary bypass.

Authors:  Efstratios E Apostolakis; Efstratios N Koletsis; Nikolaos G Baikoussis; Stavros N Siminelakis; Georgios S Papadopoulos
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2010-01-11       Impact factor: 1.637

10.  Modified ultrafiltration reduces postoperative blood loss and transfusions in adult cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Zhao Kai Low; Fei Gao; Kenny Yoong Kong Sin; Kok Hooi Yap
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2021-05-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.