OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the characteristics of an ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxides (USPIO) agent in patients with brain tumors and to correlate changes on MRI with histopathologic data collected systematically in all patients. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Nine patients with brain tumors were imaged before and 24 hr after administration of a USPIO at a dose of 2.6 mg Fe/kg. Analysis of MR images included qualitative and quantitative comparison of the USPIO and gadolinium enhancement of brain tumors. Brain surgery was performed 25-112 hr after administration of the USPIO. The histopathologic workup included iron histochemistry with diaminobenzidine (DAB)-enhanced Perls stain. RESULTS: In seven of nine patients, USPIO-related changes of signal intensity were observed in gadolinium-enhancing brain tumors on T1- and T2*-weighted sequences. The difference in signal intensity on T1-weighted USPIO series was 40.1% +/- 26.7% (mean +/- SD). On T2*-weighted USPIO series, the difference in signal intensity was -33.1% +/- 18.4% in solid tumor parts. Areas of suspected radiation necrosis did not enhance in three patients with prior radiation therapy. Iron histochemistry revealed the presence of iron deposits in macrophages in two patients. CONCLUSION: USPIO agents will not replace gadolinium in the workup of patients with brain tumors. Our findings suggest that USPIO agents seem to offer complementary information and may help to differentiate between brain tumors and areas of radiation necrosis. Signal intensity changes on T2*-weighted images might be related to the blood pool properties of the agent, possibly reflecting steady-state susceptibility effects.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the characteristics of an ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxides (USPIO) agent in patients with brain tumors and to correlate changes on MRI with histopathologic data collected systematically in all patients. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Nine patients with brain tumors were imaged before and 24 hr after administration of a USPIO at a dose of 2.6 mg Fe/kg. Analysis of MR images included qualitative and quantitative comparison of the USPIO and gadolinium enhancement of brain tumors. Brain surgery was performed 25-112 hr after administration of the USPIO. The histopathologic workup included iron histochemistry with diaminobenzidine (DAB)-enhanced Perls stain. RESULTS: In seven of nine patients, USPIO-related changes of signal intensity were observed in gadolinium-enhancing brain tumors on T1- and T2*-weighted sequences. The difference in signal intensity on T1-weighted USPIO series was 40.1% +/- 26.7% (mean +/- SD). On T2*-weighted USPIO series, the difference in signal intensity was -33.1% +/- 18.4% in solid tumor parts. Areas of suspected radiation necrosis did not enhance in three patients with prior radiation therapy. Iron histochemistry revealed the presence of iron deposits in macrophages in two patients. CONCLUSION: USPIO agents will not replace gadolinium in the workup of patients with brain tumors. Our findings suggest that USPIO agents seem to offer complementary information and may help to differentiate between brain tumors and areas of radiation necrosis. Signal intensity changes on T2*-weighted images might be related to the blood pool properties of the agent, possibly reflecting steady-state susceptibility effects.
Authors: Gregory A Christoforidis; Ming Yang; Marinos S Kontzialis; Douglas G Larson; Amir Abduljalil; Michelle Basso; Weilian Yang; Abhik Ray-Chaudhury; Johannes Heverhagen; Michael V Knopp; Rolf F Barth Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2009-07 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: G Gambarota; W Leenders; C Maass; P Wesseling; B van der Kogel; O van Tellingen; A Heerschap Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2008-05-27 Impact factor: 7.640