OBJECTIVE: To review the definition of 'primary care' and 'inappropriate' patients in ED and develop a generally acceptable working definition of a 'primary care' presentation in ED. METHOD: A Medline review of articles on primary care in ED and the definitions used. RESULTS: A total of 34 reviewed papers contained a proposed definition or comment on the definition for potential 'primary care', 'general practice', or 'inappropriate' patients in ED. A representative definition was developed premised on the common factors in these papers: low urgency/acuity--triage categories four or five in the Australasian Triage Scale, self-referred--by definition, patients referred by general practitioner/community primary medical services are not primary care cases because a primary care service has referred them on, presenting for a new episode of care (i.e. not a planned return because planned returns are not self-referred), unlikely to be admitted (in the opinion of Emergency Nurse interviewers) or ultimately not admitted. DISCUSSION: This definition can be applied either prospectively or retrospectively, depending on the purpose. Appropriateness must be considered in light of a legitimate role for ED in primary care and the balance of resources between primary care and emergency medicine in local settings.
OBJECTIVE: To review the definition of 'primary care' and 'inappropriate'patients in ED and develop a generally acceptable working definition of a 'primary care' presentation in ED. METHOD: A Medline review of articles on primary care in ED and the definitions used. RESULTS: A total of 34 reviewed papers contained a proposed definition or comment on the definition for potential 'primary care', 'general practice', or 'inappropriate'patients in ED. A representative definition was developed premised on the common factors in these papers: low urgency/acuity--triage categories four or five in the Australasian Triage Scale, self-referred--by definition, patients referred by general practitioner/community primary medical services are not primary care cases because a primary care service has referred them on, presenting for a new episode of care (i.e. not a planned return because planned returns are not self-referred), unlikely to be admitted (in the opinion of Emergency Nurse interviewers) or ultimately not admitted. DISCUSSION: This definition can be applied either prospectively or retrospectively, depending on the purpose. Appropriateness must be considered in light of a legitimate role for ED in primary care and the balance of resources between primary care and emergency medicine in local settings.
Authors: Hilde Philips; Roy Remmen; Paul Van Royen; Marc Teblick; Leo Geudens; Marc Bronckaers; Herman Meeuwis Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2010-07-30 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Anne-Claire Durand; Stéphanie Gentile; Patrick Gerbeaux; Marc Alazia; Pierre Kiegel; Stephane Luigi; Eric Lindenmeyer; Philippe Olivier; Marie-Annick Hidoux; Roland Sambuc Journal: BMC Emerg Med Date: 2011-10-31
Authors: Djalma S Guimarães; Eduardo J O Soares; Gileno Ferraz Júnior; Denise D Medeiros Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2015-02-18 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: M Christien van der Linden; Robert Lindeboom; Naomi van der Linden; Crispijn L van den Brand; Rianne C Lam; Cees Lucas; Rob de Haan; J Carel Goslings Journal: Int J Emerg Med Date: 2014-07-16