Literature DB >> 16302936

Prehospital intubation and chest decompression is associated with unexpected survival in major thoracic blunt trauma.

Nathan Bushby1, Mark Fitzgerald, Peter Cameron, Silvana Marasco, Adam Bystrzycki, Jeffrey V Rosenfeld, Michael Bailey.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Application of the Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) to a trauma population identifies patients with 'unexpected survival'. This study used TRISS analysis to identify 'unexpected survivors' suffering major thoracic trauma, who survived to hospital discharge. Further analysis determined prehospital interventions that appeared to contribute to 'unexpected survival'.
METHODS: The present study was a single-centre, retrospective case review with comparative statistical analysis. Patients were identified from the Alfred Trauma Registry between 1 July 2002 and 30 June 2003.
RESULTS: There were 336 adult trauma patients treated at The Alfred Trauma Centre with an Injury Severity Score >15 (major trauma) and at least one thoracic Anatomical Injury Score of 3 (severe) or greater. Of the eligible patients, 322/336 (95.8%, 95%[confidence interval] CI 95.1-96.5%) had complete data available for analysis. The study population mortality was 42/322 (13.0%, 95% CI 12.3-13.7%). There were 20 'unexpected survivors' (5.9%) and 5 (1.5%) 'unexpected deaths' on TRISS analysis. Chest decompression and/or endotracheal intubation prehospital was performed on 16/20 'unexpected survivors'. GCS for 'unexpected survivors' and 'expected deaths' (3.8 vs 3.5, P = 0.27) was not a predictor of survival. Respiratory rate per minute (16.2 vs 8.8, P = 0.01) and systolic blood pressure - mmHg (98 vs 80, P = 0.03) were significantly greater in the 'unexpected survivors' group compared with the 'expected death' group.
CONCLUSION: For patients sustaining severe thoracic blunt trauma, prehospital intubation and chest decompression appear to be associated with unexpected survival. A low GCS at scene is not predictive of 'unexpected survival' or 'expected death'.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16302936     DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2005.00775.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Med Australas        ISSN: 1742-6723            Impact factor:   2.151


  7 in total

Review 1.  Management of chest trauma.

Authors:  Corinna Ludwig; Aris Koryllos
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Preventable Deaths in Multiple Trauma Patients: The Importance of Auditing and Continuous Quality Improvement.

Authors:  Gui-Xi Zhang; Ke-Jin Chen; Hong-Tao Zhu; Ai-Ling Lin; Zhong-Hui Liu; Li-Chang Liu; Ren Ji; Fion Siu Yin Chan; Joe King Man Fan
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  [Prehospital treatment of severely injured patients in the field: an update].

Authors:  C Probst; F Hildebrand; M Frink; P Mommsen; C Krettek
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  Do mannequin chests provide an accurate representation of a human chest for simulated decompression of tension pneumothoraxes?

Authors:  Malcolm J Boyle; Brett Williams; Simon Dousek
Journal:  World J Emerg Med       Date:  2012

Review 5.  Revisiting the value of pre-hospital tracheal intubation: an all time systematic literature review extracting the Utstein airway core variables.

Authors:  Hans Morten Lossius; Stephen J M Sollid; Marius Rehn; David J Lockey
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 9.097

6.  Timely completion of multiple life-saving interventions for traumatic haemorrhagic shock: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Biswadev Mitra; Jordan Bade-Boon; Mark C Fitzgerald; Ben Beck; Peter A Cameron
Journal:  Burns Trauma       Date:  2019-07-18

Review 7.  Pro/con debate: is the scoop and run approach the best approach to trauma services organization?

Authors:  Barbara Haas; Avery B Nathens
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 9.097

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.