Literature DB >> 16302217

Minimal residual disease (MRD) measurement as a tool to compare the efficacy of chemotherapeutic drug regimens using Escherichia Coli-asparaginase or Erwinia-asparaginase in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).

Cecilia Sze Kwok1, Shirley Kow Kham, Hany Ariffin, Hai Peng Lin, Thuan Chong Quah, Allen Eng Yeoh.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: L-asparaginase is a crucial drug in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) induction therapy, but much debate remains regarding the optimal formulation and dosage. As minimal residual disease (MRD) can accurately measure extremely low levels of lymphoblasts, it is a sensitive reflection of leukemia cell kill. We utilized MRD to compare the efficacy of Erwinia-asparaginase (Erwinia-asp) and E. coli-asparaginase (E. coli-asp) during induction therapy for childhood ALL. PROCEDURE: Of 116 precursor-B ALL patients, 22 were treated with Erwinia-asp, 90 with E. coli-asp, and 4 were switched from E. coli-asp to Erwinia-asp. MRD levels at the end of induction were analyzed for 90 patients (Erwinia-asp = 16; E. coli-asp = 74). Patients were stratified into MRD > or =10(-2), between 10(-2)-10(-4) and < or =10(-4). Toxicity information during induction was available for 110 patients.
RESULTS: MRD was the only significant prognosticator compared to conventional criteria. Patients treated with Erwinia-asp were 6.7 times more likely to have MRD levels > or =10(-2) (P = 0.031), reflecting slower lymphoblast clearance. While non-asparaginase related toxicities were similar in both groups, more E. coli-asp patients experienced severe asparaginase-related toxicity.
CONCLUSION: E. coli-asp is superior to Erwinia-asp in childhood ALL induction. Although E. coli-asp is more toxic, this is balanced by better response to therapy. Early response to treatment as measured by MRD is a direct reflection of leukemic cell kill and is a significant prognosticator of eventual outcome, making it a good surrogate marker to evaluate the efficacy of induction drugs in childhood ALL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16302217     DOI: 10.1002/pbc.20684

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer        ISSN: 1545-5009            Impact factor:   3.167


  5 in total

Review 1.  Treatment of pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia: progress achieved and challenges remaining.

Authors:  Paul S Gaynon
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.952

Review 2.  L-asparaginase treatment in acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a focus on Erwinia asparaginase.

Authors:  Rob Pieters; Stephen P Hunger; Joachim Boos; Carmelo Rizzari; Lewis Silverman; Andre Baruchel; Nicola Goekbuget; Martin Schrappe; Ching-Hon Pui
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Mutations in subunit interface and B-cell epitopes improve antileukemic activities of Escherichia coli asparaginase-II: evaluation of immunogenicity in mice.

Authors:  Ranjit Kumar Mehta; Shikha Verma; Rashmirekha Pati; Mitali Sengupta; Biswajit Khatua; Rabindra Kumar Jena; Sudha Sethy; Santosh K Kar; Chitra Mandal; Klaus H Roehm; Avinash Sonawane
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Allergic reactions and antiasparaginase antibodies in children with high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A children's oncology group report.

Authors:  Richard H Ko; Tamekia L Jones; David Radvinsky; Nathan Robison; Paul S Gaynon; Eduard H Panosyan; Ioannis A Avramis; Vassilios I Avramis; Joan Rubin; Lawrence J Ettinger; Nita L Seibel; Girish Dhall
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Population pharmacokinetics of intravenous Erwinia asparaginase in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients.

Authors:  Sebastiaan D T Sassen; Ron A A Mathôt; Rob Pieters; Robin Q H Kloos; Valérie de Haas; Gertjan J L Kaspers; Cor van den Bos; Wim J E Tissing; Maroeska Te Loo; Marc B Bierings; Wouter J W Kollen; Christian M Zwaan; Inge M van der Sluis
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 9.941

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.