Literature DB >> 16301863

Cytogenetic and molecular evaluation of 241 small supernumerary marker chromosomes: cooperative study of 19 Italian laboratories.

Leda Dalprà1, Daniela Giardino, Palma Finelli, Cecilia Corti, Chiara Valtorta, Silvana Guerneri, Patrizia Ilardi, Renato Fortuna, Domenico Coviello, Gianfranco Nocera, Francesco Paolo Amico, Emanuela Martinoli, Elena Sala, Nicoletta Villa, Francesca Crosti, Francamaria Chiodo, Ludovica Verdun di Cantogno, Elisa Savin, Gianfranco Croci, Fabrizia Franchi, Giovanna Venti, Emilio Donti, Valeria Migliori, Antonella Pettinari, Stefania Bonifacio, Claudia Centrone, Francesca Torricelli, Simona Rossi, Paolo Simi, Paola Granata, Rosario Casalone, Elisabetta Lenzini, Lina Artifoni, Vanna Pecile, Sergio Barlati, Daniela Bellotti, Daniele Caufin, Adalgisa Police, Simona Cavani, Giuseppe Piombo, Mauro Pierluigi, Lidia Larizza.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We evaluated the experiences of 19 Italian laboratories concerning 241 small supernumerary marker chromosomes (sSMCs) with the aim of answering questions arising from their origin from any chromosome, their variable size and genetic content, and their impact on the carrier's phenotype.
METHODS: Conventional protocols were used to set up the cultures and chromosome preparations. Both commercial and homemade probes were used for the fluorescent in situ hybridization analyses.
RESULTS: A total of 113 of the 241 sSMCs were detected antenatally, and 128 were detected postnatally. There were 52 inherited and 172 de novo cases. Abnormal phenotype was present in 137 cases (57%), 38 of which were antenatally diagnosed. A mosaic condition was observed in 87 cases (36%). In terms of morphology, monocentric and dicentric bisatellited marker chromosomes were the most common, followed by monocentric rings and short-arm isochromosomes. The chromosomes generating the sSMCs were acrocentric in 132 cases (69%) and non-acrocentric chromosomes in 60 cases (31%); a neocentromere was hypothesized in three cases involving chromosomes 6, 8, and 15.
CONCLUSION: The presented and published data still do not allow any definite conclusions to be drawn concerning karyotype-phenotype correlations. Only concerted efforts to characterize molecularly the sSMCs associated or not with a clinical phenotype can yield results suitable for addressing karyotype-phenotype correlations in support of genetic counseling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16301863     DOI: 10.1097/01.gim.0000182876.57766.2d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Med        ISSN: 1098-3600            Impact factor:   8.822


  9 in total

Review 1.  Neocentromeres: new insights into centromere structure, disease development, and karyotype evolution.

Authors:  Owen J Marshall; Anderly C Chueh; Lee H Wong; K H Andy Choo
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Mechanisms and consequences of small supernumerary marker chromosomes: from Barbara McClintock to modern genetic-counseling issues.

Authors:  Erin L Baldwin; Lorraine F May; April N Justice; Christa L Martin; David H Ledbetter
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Neocentromeres to the Rescue of Acentric Chromosome Fragments.

Authors:  Martin Poot
Journal:  Mol Syndromol       Date:  2017-10-11

4.  Marker chromosome genomic structure and temporal origin implicate a chromoanasynthesis event in a family with pleiotropic psychiatric phenotypes.

Authors:  Christopher M Grochowski; Shen Gu; Bo Yuan; Julia Tcw; Kristen J Brennand; Jonathan Sebat; Dheeraj Malhotra; Shane McCarthy; Uwe Rudolph; Anna Lindstrand; Zechen Chong; Deborah L Levy; James R Lupski; Claudia M B Carvalho
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 4.878

5.  Genetic dosage and position effect of small supernumerary marker chromosome (sSMC) in human sperm nuclei in infertile male patient.

Authors:  Marta Olszewska; Elzbieta Wanowska; Archana Kishore; Nataliya Huleyuk; Andrew P Georgiadis; Alexander N Yatsenko; Mariya Mikula; Danuta Zastavna; Ewa Wiland; Maciej Kurpisz
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Chromosome 15 structural abnormalities: effect on IGF1R gene expression and function.

Authors:  Rossella Cannarella; Teresa Mattina; Rosita A Condorelli; Laura M Mongioì; Giuseppe Pandini; Sandro La Vignera; Aldo E Calogero
Journal:  Endocr Connect       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 3.335

Review 7.  Prenatal diagnosis of a de novo tetrasomy 15q24.3-25.3: Case report and literature review.

Authors:  Xiaonan Hu; Leilei Li; Hongguo Zhang; Zhuming Hu; Linlin Li; Meiling Sun; Ruizhi Liu
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 2.352

8.  Familiar unbalanced complex rearrangements involving 13 p-arm: description of two cases.

Authors:  Donatella Conconi; Nicoletta Villa; Serena Redaelli; Elena Sala; Francesca Crosti; Silva Maitz; Miriam Rigoldi; Rossella Parini; Leda Dalprà; Marialuisa Lavitrano; Gaia Roversi
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 2.009

9.  Molecular delineation of small supernumerary marker chromosomes using a single nucleotide polymorphism array.

Authors:  Lili Zhou; Zhaoke Zheng; Lianpeng Wu; Chenyang Xu; Hao Wu; Xueqin Xu; Shaohua Tang
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 2.009

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.