Literature DB >> 16300870

The wealthy get healthy, the poor get poorly? Lay perceptions of health inequalities.

Rosemary Davidson1, Jenny Kitzinger, Kate Hunt.   

Abstract

Research repeatedly identifies an association between health and socio-economic status-richer people are healthier than poorer people. Richard Wilkinson has posited that socio-psychological mechanisms may be part of the explanation for the fact that socio-economic inequalities run right across the social spectrum in wealthy societies. He argues that polarised income distributions within countries have a negative impact on stress, self-esteem and social relations which, in turn, impact on physical well-being. How people experience and perceive inequalities is central to his thesis. However, relatively little empirical work has explored such lay perceptions. We attempt to address this gap by exploring how people see inequality, how they theorise its impact on health, and the extent to which they make personal and social comparisons, by drawing on 14 focus group discussions in Scotland and the north of England. Contrary to other research which suggests that people from more deprived backgrounds are more reluctant to acknowledge the effects of socio-economic deprivation, our findings demonstrate that, in some contexts at least, people from less favourable circumstances converse in a way to suggest that inequalities deeply affect their health and well-being. We discuss these findings in the light of the methodological challenges presented for pursuing such research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16300870     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.10.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  9 in total

1.  The influence of subjective social status on vulnerability to postpartum smoking among young pregnant women.

Authors:  Lorraine R Reitzel; Jennifer I Vidrine; Yisheng Li; Patricia D Mullen; Mary M Velasquez; Paul M Cinciripini; Ludmila Cofta-Woerpel; Anthony Greisinger; David W Wetter
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2007-06-28       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  The psychosocial versus material hypothesis to explain observed inequality in disability among older adults: data from the West of Scotland Twenty-07 Study.

Authors:  Joy A Adamson; Shah Ebrahim; Kate Hunt
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  Public awareness of income-related health inequalities in Ontario, Canada.

Authors:  Ketan Shankardass; Aisha Lofters; Maritt Kirst; Carlos Quiñonez
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2012-05-21

4.  From causes to solutions--insights from lay knowledge about health inequalities.

Authors:  Christine Putland; Fran E Baum; Anna M Ziersch
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  Qualitative exploration of sociocultural determinants of health inequities of Dalit population in Dhaka City, Bangladesh.

Authors:  Ashraful Kabir; Mathilde Rose Louise Maitrot; Ahsan Ali; Nadia Farhana; Bart Criel
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-12-14       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Assessing Health Literacy Among Chinese Speakers in the U.S. with Limited English Proficiency.

Authors:  Xuewei Chen; Patricia Goodson; Sandra Acosta; Adam E Barry; Lisako E McKyer
Journal:  Health Lit Res Pract       Date:  2018-05-10

7.  Stakeholders' perspective on health equity and its indicators in Iran: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Hamid Ravaghi; Massomeh Goshtaei; Alireza Olyaee Manesh; Nazanin Abolhassani; Jalal Arabloo
Journal:  Med J Islam Repub Iran       Date:  2015-08-22

8.  Developing Indicators to Measure Critical Health Literacy in the Context of Norwegian Lower Secondary Schools.

Authors:  Anders L Hage Haugen; Kirsti Riiser; Marc Esser-Noethlichs; Ove Edvard Hatlevik
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  "How the other half live": Lay perspectives on health inequalities in an age of austerity.

Authors:  Kayleigh Garthwaite; Clare Bambra
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 4.634

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.