Literature DB >> 16300748

Amplitudes of head movements during putative eye-only saccades.

Brian S Oommen1, John S Stahl.   

Abstract

The mechanisms allowing humans and other primates to dissociate head and eye movements during saccades are poorly understood. A more precise knowledge of head movement behavior during apparent eye-only saccades may provide insight into those mechanisms. We studied the distributions of head amplitude in normal humans. In half of the subjects, these distributions indicated the presence of a population of minor ("residual") head movements during eye-only saccades, distinct from the continuum of head movements generated during frank eye-head saccades. Like full-sized head movements, the residual movements grew in proportion to target eccentricity, indicating their drive is derived from the premotor command for the saccade. Furthermore, their amplitudes related most strongly to the head amplitudes obtained when subjects produced full-sized head movements and were reduced when subjects were instructed to perform exclusively eye-only saccades. Both observations suggest that the drive for residual head movements originates downstream of the point in which the head movement command diverges from the generalized gaze shift command. The results are consistent with a model of head control in which a neural gate prevents the common gaze shift command from reaching the head premotor circuitry whenever an eye-only saccade is desired. However, the gate is either imperfect or the multiple pathways that relay gaze shift signals to the head motor circuitry allow for the gate to be circumvented. The results underscore the need for physiological studies to probe neuronal activity related to neck activation during eye-only saccades.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16300748     DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2005.10.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  9 in total

1.  Eye-head coupling tendencies in stationary and moving subjects.

Authors:  Zachary C Thumser; John S Stahl
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-04-26       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Idiosyncratic variations in eye-head coupling observed in the laboratory also manifest during spontaneous behavior in a natural setting.

Authors:  Zachary C Thumser; Brian S Oommen; Igor S Kofman; John S Stahl
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Differential influence of attention on gaze and head movements.

Authors:  Aarlenne Z Khan; Gunnar Blohm; Robert M McPeek; Philippe Lefèvre
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-11-05       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Probing the mechanism of saccade-associated head movements through observations of head movement propensity and cognition in the elderly.

Authors:  Zachary C Thumser; Nancy L Adams; Alan J Lerner; John S Stahl
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-03-05       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Development of head movement propensity in 4-15 year old children in response to visual step stimuli.

Authors:  Krysta Murray; Linda Lillakas; Rebecca Weber; Suzanne Moore; Elizabeth Irving
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-09-06       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Gaze-shift strategies during functional activity in progressive supranuclear palsy.

Authors:  Richard P Di Fabio; Cris Zampieri; Paul Tuite
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-11-08       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Interaction between the oculomotor and postural systems during a dual-task: Compensatory reductions in head sway following visually-induced postural perturbations promote the production of accurate double-step saccades in standing human adults.

Authors:  Mathieu Boulanger; Guillaume Giraudet; Jocelyn Faubert
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Facilitation of visual perception in head direction: visual attention modulation based on head direction.

Authors:  Ryoichi Nakashima; Satoshi Shioiri
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Why do we move our head to look at an object in our peripheral region? Lateral viewing interferes with attentive search.

Authors:  Ryoichi Nakashima; Satoshi Shioiri
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.