Literature DB >> 16300704

Predictive power of Mannheim Peritonitis Index.

Abrar Maqbool Qureshi1, Afsheen Zafar, Khurram Saeed, Abdul Quddus.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate Mannheim Peritonitis Index (MPI) in predicting outcome in patients with secondary peritonitis and to assess each risk factor independently regarding its contribution towards final outcome.
DESIGN: Prospective analytical study. PLACE AND DURATION OF STUDY: Surgical Unit-II of Rawalpindi General Hospital, from December 1999 to January 2001. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and twenty-six patients who presented to the department with secondary peritonitis were included in the study. MPI score was calculated for each patient on a pre-designed proforma and the patients were followed-up till death or discharged from the hospital. Death was the main outcome measure against which the MPI scores were analyzed under two categories; (i) score > or = 26 and < 26 (ii) scores < 21, 2-29, and > 29. Data was analyzed on software SPSS (version 11.0). Chi-square test was used to assess any significant association between scores and outcome. Odds ratios were calculated for individual risk factors.
RESULTS: Mortality rate for MPI score > or = 26 was 28.1% while for scores less than 26 it was 4.3%. For MPI scores pound 20 mortality rate was 1.9%, for scores 21-29 it was 21.9% and for score 30 or more it was 28.1%. Chi-square showed significant association between mortality and increasing MPI score (p < 0.01). Odd ratios calculated were significant for age > 50 years, malignancy, organ failure, pre-operative duration of peritonitis > 24 hours and cloudy, purulent exudate.
CONCLUSION: Increasing MPI score is strongly associated with outcome in secondary peritonitis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16300704     DOI: 11.2005/JCPSP.693696

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Coll Physicians Surg Pak        ISSN: 1022-386X            Impact factor:   0.711


  8 in total

1.  Efficacy of Mannheim Peritonitis Index (MPI) Score in Patients with Secondary Peritonitis.

Authors:  Muralidhar V A; Madhu C P; Sudhir S; Madhu Srinivasarangan
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-12-05

2.  An audit of secondary peritonitis at a tertiary care university hospital of Sindh, Pakistan.

Authors:  Ahmer A Memon; Faisal G Siddiqui; Arshad H Abro; Ahmed H Agha; Shahzadi Lubna; Abdul S Memon
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  Peritonitis - the Eastern experience.

Authors:  Sanjay Gupta; Robin Kaushik
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2006-04-26       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  Assessment of Severity of Peritonitis Using Mannheim Peritonitis Index.

Authors:  Sanjeev Sharma; Sumitoj Singh; Nikhil Makkar; Ashok Kumar; Mandeep Singh Sandhu
Journal:  Niger J Surg       Date:  2016 Jul-Dec

5.  Giant duodenal ulcers after neurosurgery for brainstem tumors that required reoperation for gastric disconnection: a report of two cases.

Authors:  Chihoko Nobori; Kenjiro Kimura; Go Ohira; Ryosuke Amano; Sadaaki Yamazoe; Hiroaki Tanaka; Kentaro Naito; Toshihiro Takami; Kosei Hirakawa; Masaichi Ohira
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Pre-operative risk scores for the prediction of outcome in elderly people who require emergency surgery.

Authors:  Thomas E Rix; Tom Bates
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2007-06-05       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  Assessing the risk: Scoring systems for outcome prediction in emergency laparotomies.

Authors:  Deb Sanjay Nag
Journal:  Biomedicine (Taipei)       Date:  2015-11-28

8.  Which cause of diffuse peritonitis is the deadliest in the tropics? A retrospective analysis of 305 cases from the South-West Region of Cameroon.

Authors:  Alain Chichom-Mefire; Tabe Alain Fon; Marcelin Ngowe-Ngowe
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 5.469

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.