| Literature DB >> 16300681 |
Jeroen J M Hoozemans1, Elise S van Haastert, Robert Veerhuis, Thomas Arendt, Wiep Scheper, Piet Eikelenboom, Annemieke J M Rozemuller.
Abstract
Neuronal expression of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) and cell cycle proteins is suggested to contribute to neurodegeneration during Alzheimer's disease (AD). The stimulus that induces COX-2 and cell cycle protein expression in AD is still elusive. Activated glia cells are shown to secrete substances that can induce expression of COX-2 and cell cycle proteins in vitro. Using post mortem brain tissue we have investigated whether activation of microglia and astrocytes in AD brain can be correlated with the expression of COX-2 and phosphorylated retinoblastoma protein (ppRb). The highest levels of neuronal COX-2 and ppRb immunoreactivity are observed in the first stages of AD pathology (Braak 0-II, Braak A). No significant difference in COX-2 or ppRb neuronal immunoreactivity is observed between Braak stage 0 and later Braak stages for neurofibrillary changes or amyloid plaques. The mean number of COX-2 or ppRb immunoreactive neurons is significantly decreased in Braak stage C compared to Braak stage A for amyloid deposits. Immunoreactivity for glial markers KP1, CR3/43 and GFAP appears in the later Braak stages and is significantly increased in Braak stage V-VI compared to Braak stage 0 for neurofibrillary changes. In addition, a significant negative correlation is observed between the presence of KP1, CR3/43 and GFAP immunoreactivity and the presence of neuronal immunoreactivity for COX-2 and ppRb. These data show that maximal COX-2 and ppRb immunoreactivity in neurons occurs during early Braak stages prior to the maximal activation of astrocytes and microglia. In contrast to in vitro studies, post mortem data do not support a causal relation between the activation of microglia and astrocytes and the expression of neuronal COX-2 and ppRb in the pathological cascade of AD.Entities:
Year: 2005 PMID: 16300681 PMCID: PMC1308853 DOI: 10.1186/1742-2094-2-27
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Neuroinflammation ISSN: 1742-2094 Impact factor: 8.322
Demographic characteristics of the cases used in this study. Shown are differences between groups of the cases used in this study. [PMI post-mortem interval, SD standard deviation].
| O | I–II | III–IV | V–VI | ||
| 5 | 16 | 10 | 9 | ||
| 3/2 | 6/10 | 0/10 | 3/6 | ||
| 62 ± 10 | 83 ± 8 | 89 ± 4 | 76 ± 7 | ||
| 8:00 ± 4:30 | 7:30 ± 2:30 | 6:30 ± 2:30 | 5:00 ± 1:30 | ||
| O | A | B | C | total | |
| 7 | 6 | 11 | 16 | 40 | |
| 4/3 | 3/3 | 3/8 | 2/14 | 12/28 | |
| 69 ± 12 | 79 ± 4 | 85 ± 10 | 82 ± 10 | 80 ± 11 | |
| 7:00 ± 4:00 | 8:30 ± 3:00 | 7:00 ± 2:30 | 6:00 ± 2:00 | 6:30 ± 2:30 | |
Figure 1Immunoreactivity scores for KP1, CR3/43, GFAP, ppRb and COX-2 in the temporal cortex of nondemented control and AD cases. Immunohistochemical stainings were performed as described previously [6]. The following primary antibodies were used: rabbit polyclonal anti-COX-2 (Cayman, Ann Arbor, MI), rabbit anti-phosphoserine pRb (pSer 795, Cell Signaling, Beverly, MA). Mouse anti-CD68 (KP1) and mouse anti-HLA-DP, DQ, DR (CR3/43) were obtained from DAKO (Heverlee, Belgium). Mouse anti-Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (GFAP) was obtained from Monosan (clone 6F2, Uden, The Netherlands). Morphometric investigation was aimed at determining the area density occupied by the immunoreactive glial cells in the cortical layer. The area density (%) was quantified using Image-Pro Plus analysis software (Media Cybernetics, Silver Spring, MD). Immunoreactive neurons (COX-2 and ppRb) were counted in a total area of 2 mm2. Neurons were distinguished from non-neuronal cells by nuclear size and shape. Values of cases are grouped according to the Braak stage for neurofibrillary changes (O, I-II, III-IV, V-VI) or Aβ deposits (O, A, B, C). Results are expressed as box plots. The box represents the interquartile range that contains 50% of the values. The whiskers extend from the box to the highest and lowest values. The line across the box indicates the median. Kruskall-Wallis test was used to evaluate differences between groups followed by the Mann-Whitney U test, to test differences between pairs of groups. Correlation analysis was done using the Pearson parametric and Spearman non-parametric method. * p < 0.05 versus Braak stage O. # p < 0.05 versus Braak stage C.