Literature DB >> 16299783

Surgical techniques.

T Lerut1, W Coosemans, G Decker, P De Leyn, J Moons, P Nafteux, D Van Raemdonck.   

Abstract

Adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) has shown a remarkable increase during recent decades. Most patients are present with advanced stage disease, reflecting transmural growth and metastasis to lymph nodes at the time of diagnosis. Moreover, the pattern of lymph node dissemination is chaotic and difficult to predict, and despite the use of modern technology (e.g., spiral CT, EUS, FDG-PET), clinical staging remains suboptimal. These shortcomings in staging, as well as in different attitudes toward extent of resection and lymphadenectomy, are reflected by a great variation in surgical techniques, which are discussed in this review. As to the results, primary surgery can currently be performed with low mortality, below 5% in high volume centers. Hospital mortality and morbidity are mainly related to pulmonary complications and anastomotic leaks, the latter mostly resolving under conservative treatment. Overall 5-year survival varies between 10% and 59%. As expected the most important prognostic determinants are completeness of resection (R0 vs. R1-R2) and lymph node status (N0, N1). R0 resection currently offers 5-year survival rates of over 40%. Five-year survival figures for node-negative (N0) patients exceed 70%, and even for node-positive (N1), patients reach 25%. It is not known whether performing a three-field lymph node dissection is beneficial for patients with adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus. With overall 5-year survival currently exceeding 30%-40%, these figures should be the gold standard against which all other therapeutic modalities are compared. (c) 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16299783     DOI: 10.1002/jso.20363

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0022-4790            Impact factor:   3.454


  5 in total

1.  Ivor Lewis subtotal esophagectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy for squamous cell carcinoma of the lower thoracic esophagus.

Authors:  Jie Wu; Ying Chai; Xing-Ming Zhou; Qi-Xun Chen; Fu-Lai Yan
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-08-28       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Comprehensive management of full-thickness luminal defects: The next frontier of gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Authors:  Joshua S Winder; Eric M Pauli
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-07-10

3.  Timing of Adjuvant Chemoradiation in pT1-3N1-2 or pT4aN1 Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma After R0 Esophagectomy.

Authors:  Leilei Wu; Zhenshan Zhang; Shuo Li; Linping Ke; Jinming Yu; Xue Meng
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 3.989

4.  Optimizing intensive care capacity using individual length-of-stay prediction models.

Authors:  Mark Van Houdenhoven; Duy-Tien Nguyen; Marinus J Eijkemans; Ewout W Steyerberg; Hugo W Tilanus; Diederik Gommers; Gerhard Wullink; Jan Bakker; Geert Kazemier
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.097

5.  Endoscope-assisted mediastinal drainage therapy for anastomosis leakage after esophagectomy: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Wei Guo; Lianggang Zhu; Yuquan Wu; Su Yang; Hailei Du; Xiang Zhou; Jiaming Che; Junbiao Hang; Hecheng Li
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-12
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.